cool :)
but those scripts can be easily improved:
Gofer it
url: ‘filetree:///home/deploy’;
package: ‘WebCounter’;
package: ‘HelloWorldApp’;
load.
stdout << 'WebCounter installed'; lf.
ZnZincServerAdaptor startOn: 8080.
WAAdmin register: WebCounter asApplicationAt
Sure but the deployment issue is orchestration. The distribution of
functionality works along the available resources. The example machine Sven
mentioned (32 cores, 96 MB) is worth nothing if you have a lot of instances and
spindle hard discs. It is an act of finding the balance that uses the m
Yes but are they working as nicely on Macs and Win boxes running
Dockermachine?
Phil
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 9:48 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote:
> LXC/LXD containers are much nicer, IMHO, as they look and feel like a
> regular VM, yet are way more efficient.
>
> > On 30 Nov 2015, at 21:43, Es
:) Well, looking at all the isolation containers I still have doubts that
isolation is working as expected. There are many influences that make
containers less independent. Prominent candidate is (as always) I/O that has
the ability to slow down everything.
But let's talk! I always appreciate ex
https://github.com/Geal/pharo-seaside-docker-example
https://www.clever-cloud.com/blog/guests/2015/01/05/smalltalk-in-the-cloud/
Phil
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 9:43 PM, Esteban A. Maringolo
wrote:
> Do you have a recipe to put Pharo in a Docker container?
> Esteban A. Maringolo
>
>
> 2015-11-30
> On 30 Nov 2015, at 22:08, Norbert Hartl wrote:
>
> true. We use them a lot
Good to know, we're currently deploying an upgrade to our server park, all new
machines (32 cores, 96 Gb RAM each) will be running many LXC/LXD instances,
probably using ZFS for their storage. The networking was the
true. We use them a lot
+1
Norbert
> Am 30.11.2015 um 21:48 schrieb Sven Van Caekenberghe :
>
> LXC/LXD containers are much nicer, IMHO, as they look and feel like a regular
> VM, yet are way more efficient.
>
>> On 30 Nov 2015, at 21:43, Esteban A. Maringolo wrote:
>>
>> Do you have a reci
LXC/LXD containers are much nicer, IMHO, as they look and feel like a regular
VM, yet are way more efficient.
> On 30 Nov 2015, at 21:43, Esteban A. Maringolo wrote:
>
> Do you have a recipe to put Pharo in a Docker container?
> Esteban A. Maringolo
>
>
> 2015-11-30 17:34 GMT-03:00 p...@higho
Do you have a recipe to put Pharo in a Docker container?
Esteban A. Maringolo
2015-11-30 17:34 GMT-03:00 p...@highoctane.be :
> I have been using Pharo somewhat less in my current projects.
>
> Nevertheless, I needed a tool done fast and behaving correctly.
>
> Did it the TDD way with Pharo.
>
>
I have been using Pharo somewhat less in my current projects.
Nevertheless, I needed a tool done fast and behaving correctly.
Did it the TDD way with Pharo.
Great experience. Great productivity. No messing around with external
libraries, modules...
64-bit Linux compatibility would really help t
10 matches
Mail list logo
