Re: [Pharo-users] Some Metacello issue

2017-06-08 Thread Diego Lont
> On 08 Jun 2017, at 09:36, Diego Lont wrote: > > Hi all, > > To keep the common projects in smalltalkhub stable, we agreed that those > should use symbolic versions like release3 // release3.5 etc. This way we can > add bug fixes and avoiding loading of different versions through different

Re: [Pharo-users] Some Metacello issue

2017-06-08 Thread Diego Lont
Hi all, To keep the common projects in smalltalkhub stable, we agreed that those should use symbolic versions like release3 // release3.5 etc. This way we can add bug fixes and avoiding loading of different versions through different projects. But I might have done something stupid to the confi

Re: [Pharo-users] Some Metacello issue

2017-06-07 Thread Dale Henrichs
On 06/07/2017 03:46 AM, Holger Freyther wrote: On 7. Jun 2017, at 14:09, Stephan Eggermont wrote: Never refer to fixed versions unless you know why (you need to avoid a specific bug fix). When wanting to have repeatable builds (e.g. for bugfixes) and in the absence of other means to lock/def

Re: [Pharo-users] Some Metacello issue

2017-06-07 Thread Holger Freyther
> On 7. Jun 2017, at 14:09, Stephan Eggermont wrote: > > Never refer to fixed versions unless you know why (you need to avoid a > specific bug fix). When wanting to have repeatable builds (e.g. for bugfixes) and in the absence of other means to lock/define versions externally, I think using a f

Re: [Pharo-users] Some Metacello issue

2017-06-06 Thread Stephan Eggermont
I would like to repeat here again: don't refer to fixed version numbers of packages out of your control in configurations. Refer to #'release' versions that can be patched by the maintainers of your dependencies. That is only appropriate when having to patch around a problem, and couples your c

Re: [Pharo-users] Some Metacello issue

2017-06-06 Thread Stephan Eggermont
On 07/06/17 06:19, Holger Freyther wrote: Hi, after having made some new releases I have an odd Metacello issue and I am not sure how to debug it. This happens on my legacy Pharo3/Pharo4 images that I still need to support in deployment. It seems to be related to a dependency chain of "app"->Vo

[Pharo-users] Some Metacello issue

2017-06-06 Thread Holger Freyther
Hi, after having made some new releases I have an odd Metacello issue and I am not sure how to debug it. This happens on my legacy Pharo3/Pharo4 images that I still need to support in deployment. It seems to be related to a dependency chain of "app"->VoyageMongo->Magritte3 3.5.0 and somehow ve