>
>
> I was thinking the vm is able to run more than one bytecode set. Why
> couldn’t our vm support both Pharo and Java bytecodes?
Perhaps a simpler way is to make a translator from Java bytecodes -> Pharo
(Sista) bytecodes. I believe that ikvm did something similar for .NET. The
hardest part of
On 22/04/2018 11:03, henry wrote:
> I was thinking the vm is able to run more than one bytecode set. Why
> couldn’t our vm support both Pharo and Java bytecodes?
Smaltallk/X provides that Smalltalk/Java code duality.
But I think if Pharo ever pursues that path the best thing would be to
make it r
On 22 April 2018 at 22:03, henry wrote:
> I was thinking the vm is able to run more than one bytecode set. Why
> couldn’t our vm support both Pharo and Java bytecodes?
>
>
Some previous discussion here...
http://forum.world.st/java-interpreter-compiler-hosted-with-Spur-td4739237.html
cheers -ben
I was thinking the vm is able to run more than one bytecode set. Why couldn’t
our vm support both Pharo and Java bytecodes?
Sent from ProtonMail Mobile
