[Pharo-users] issue with monticello ancestor ?

2015-04-25 Thread Alexandre Bergel
Hi! I often experience that ancestors are not properly marked as non-bold in monticello. Consider the following: Why .5.mcz is in bold since it is the ancestor of version 6? Am I the only one to experience this? Alexandre -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre

Re: [Pharo-users] issue with monticello ancestor ?

2015-04-25 Thread Thierry Goubier
Hi Alexandre, with Esteban, we've been chasing around some of those bugs around for a while. But, in your case, it could perfectly be that: .6 in your image has .4 as ancestor; and .6 in your repository has .5 as ancestor... If you could, I'd like that, on that very same inspector, you

Re: [Pharo-users] issue with monticello ancestor ?

2015-04-25 Thread Yuriy Tymchuk
On 25 Apr 2015, at 18:00, Thierry Goubier thierry.goub...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Alexandre, with Esteban, we've been chasing around some of those bugs around for a while. But, in your case, it could perfectly be that: .6 in your image has .4 as ancestor; and .6 in your repository has .5

Re: [Pharo-users] issue with monticello ancestor ?

2015-04-25 Thread Thierry Goubier
Le 25/04/2015 18:09, Yuriy Tymchuk a écrit : On 25 Apr 2015, at 18:00, Thierry Goubier thierry.goub...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Alexandre, with Esteban, we've been chasing around some of those bugs around for a while. But, in your case, it could perfectly be that: .6 in your image has .4 as