Re: [Pharo-users] stupid spur question

Could somene take the time to propose a better class comments? Stef Le 2/2/16 15:11, Werner Kassens a écrit : Hi Clement, i see, thanks for this answer. werner On 02/02/2016 03:07 PM, Clément Bera wrote: Hello, Both classes (SmallFloat64 and BoxedFloat64) are present on 32 bits and 64 bits

[Pharo-users] stupid spur question

Hi, in the developersforum i read: "And in 32-bits there are only BoxedFloat64 instances. So on a 32 bits VM Floats are represented only by BoxedFloat64. On a 64 bits VM Floats are represented either by BoxedFloat64 or SmallFloat64. " i wonder whether this means, that in 32 bit systems there

Re: [Pharo-users] stupid spur question

Werner, > On 02 Feb 2016, at 14:25, Werner Kassens wrote: > > Hi, > in the developersforum i read: > "And in 32-bits there are only BoxedFloat64 instances. So on a 32 bits VM > Floats are represented only by BoxedFloat64. On a 64 bits VM Floats are > represented either

Re: [Pharo-users] stupid spur question

On 02/02/2016 02:30 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: Maybe those classes could exist in a 32-bit image as empty subclasses of float ? that is, what i hope werner

Re: [Pharo-users] stupid spur question

Hi Clement, i see, thanks for this answer. werner On 02/02/2016 03:07 PM, Clément Bera wrote: Hello, Both classes (SmallFloat64 and BoxedFloat64) are present on 32 bits and 64 bits by default right now. The code base is common between 32 and 64 bit images. It is possible to run a 32 bit image

Re: [Pharo-users] stupid spur question

Hello, Both classes (SmallFloat64 and BoxedFloat64) are present on 32 bits and 64 bits by default right now. The code base is common between 32 and 64 bit images. It is possible to run a 32 bit image without the class SmallFloat64, but it is not the default behavior. There are no instances of