Actually, the larger images do look good. But you are correct the lack
of any white space at the top does give the impression that something is
missing. Still an outstanding issue!
On 04/16/2011 10:01 PM, Tim McCormick wrote:
Folks,
Michael Evans (our new graphic designer) attempted a
Agreed! I, for one, was wowed by this edition. Great job!
Loran
On Apr 16, 2011, at 9:09 PM, Scott and Denise Corbett wrote:
> Hi Tim,
> My wife and I have always enjoyed "IN THE GROOVE" and the service
> it has provided for the hobby. Any new efforts will always have a few rocks
> in t
As far as I know, they should all be the same. If one was bigger it is
because it is a poor replacement.
Ron L
-Original Message-
From: phono-l-boun...@oldcrank.org [mailto:phono-l-boun...@oldcrank.org] On
Behalf Of William Zucca
Sent: Saturday, April 16, 2011 10:56 PM
To: Antique Phonogr
Hi Tim,
My wife and I have always enjoyed "IN THE GROOVE" and the service
it has provided for the hobby. Any new efforts will always have a few rocks
in the road. We remind ourselves that these people are volunteering their
time unselfishly for our enjoyment and see NO reason to complain
Hi- About 14 years ago a well-known record dealer visited my house and
purchased many nice records. He also saw my newly acquired Pathe Rooster with a
piece of the base broken (I had the piece) He offered $500 for it- I had paid
substantially less just a couple weeks earlier and was pleased to
Folks,
Michael Evans (our new graphic designer) attempted a design concept
with a few images that normally work for flyers and brochures, but failed to
be artistically communicated in our magazine. The most obvious use of this
technique was on the Jerry Fabris' article. Artists like to u
Hello All:
I am working on an Orthophonic Victrola V V-4-40 and have cleaned out the
old grease at the base of the tonearm as it attaches to the bracket bolted
to the rear of the turntable deck. I find 5 small ball bearings there; one
per divot in the cup on the bottom of the bracket. Am I nuts
It's worth $20 but I'll give you $25 :-)
Pics are available at this link:
http://s197.photobucket.com/albums/aa39/john9ten/Pathephone/
Does anyone else on the board have a Pathephone?
Thanks
John
--- On Sat, 4/16/11, Vinyl Visions wrote:
From: Vinyl Visions
Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Reproducer Art
Thanks Curt
I love to figure out ideas to enhance the phono collecting bug!
--- On Sat, 4/16/11, Vinyl Visions wrote:
From: Vinyl Visions
Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Reproducer Artwork
To: phono-l@oldcrank.org
Date: Saturday, April 16, 2011, 6:55 PM
Hi John,
That looks good... I did the same thi
You could carefully drill the hole and tap it if you have a drill press and
drill press vise - you would have to punch the center before drilling to make
sure it would drill centered.
> From: lhera...@bu.edu
> To: phono-l@oldcrank.org
> Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 22:59:35 -0400
> Subject: Re: [Pho
Do you have a pic of your "new" Pathe?
On the subject of Pathe - does anyone have any idea of what a Pathe advertising
plaster rooster might be worth? I found one recently, but haven't been able to
convince the owner to part with it... It is a display in an old store and no
one knows what i
Hi John,
That looks good... I did the same thing several years ago on a backmount
Zonophone machine that had the correct reproducer, but was missing the needle
bar. I used an Exhibition reproducer which fit perfectly, then scanned the
front of the Zonophone reproducer, printed it out and put
Nice.
-Barry
On 4/16/2011 3:37 PM, john robles wrote:
Hello All
I thought I would post a piece of reproducer arts and crafts for you. I
received a Pathephone 40 yesterday through the kindness of a Phono-L member who
responded to my search for one. The reproducer label was aged and blackened,
Hello All
I thought I would post a piece of reproducer arts and crafts for you. I
received a Pathephone 40 yesterday through the kindness of a Phono-L member who
responded to my search for one. The reproducer label was aged and blackened,
and since it is paper you can't clean it without risking
I think you are correct that probably blue amberol records were profitable
until 1927 because it cost so little to make them - the masters were already
made for the discs so no recording costs, the distribution network was already
in place for the discs and all the equipment was long depreciated
I hope you all read the Conference registration Alert. I know a few of you
are coming but I'm wondering if there are others here coming to ARSC for
the first time. Especially those of you on the West Coast who can drive
there. Read the abstracts and you will drool at the variety of topics.
OK,
Next time I can get there.
-Barry
On 4/15/2011 10:47 PM, Ron L'Herault wrote:
I've got a home-made one that may be too long but it will get you going if
you need it. Best bet is to contact George Vollema.
Ron
-Original Message-
From: phono-l-boun...@oldcrank.org [mailto:phono-l-b
After all, the phonograph was TAE's favorite invention & "baby", so it's
understandable that it turned out to be a not-profitable hobby. The
production of Diamond Discs still looks laborious and complicated, so that's
also no surprise if they didn't turn a profit. (What did the jobbers pay
18 matches
Mail list logo
