rom:*Phono-L [mailto:phono-l-boun...@oldcrank.org] *On Behalf Of *Jim
Nichol via Phono-L
*Sent:* Tuesday, May 07, 2019 9:34 PM
*To:* Antique Phonograph List
*Cc:* Jim Nichol
*Subject:* Re: [Phono-L] Little Wonder Phono problems
Ron, I doubt you and Mike are the only people left on this list. But
, 2019 12:08 AM
To: 'Antique Phonograph List'
Cc: Bob Maffit
Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Little Wonder Phono problems
Listers:
I had been wondering what had happened to the list and its members, as very
little was happening.
Well, it looks like we are still around.
Recently, I had inqu
I’m here, too! I just didn’t have anything useful to add!
From: Phono-L On Behalf Of Ron L'Herault via
Phono-L
Sent: Wednesday, May 8, 2019 10:26 AM
To: 'Antique Phonograph List'
Cc: Ron L'Herault
Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Little Wonder Phono problems
I was hoping
[mailto:phono-l-boun...@oldcrank.org] On Behalf Of Jim Nichol via
Phono-L
Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2019 9:34 PM
To: Antique Phonograph List
Cc: Jim Nichol
Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Little Wonder Phono problems
Ron, I doubt you and Mike are the only people left on this list. But I’ve only
run into
Ron, I totally agree with you about Facebook!
Still lurking,
Dennis
> On May 8, 2019, at 10:25 AM, Ron L'Herault via Phono-L
> wrote:
>
> I was hoping my little jest would prompt some reaction from list members.
> Facebook has really screwed up mailing list participation but I still find
Phono-L [mailto:phono-l-boun...@oldcrank.org] *On Behalf Of
*Peter Fraser via Phono-L
*Sent:* Tuesday, May 07, 2019 11:49 PM
*To:* Antique Phonograph List
*Cc:* Peter Fraser
*Subject:* Re: [Phono-L] Little Wonder Phono problems
I’m still here too!
Sent from my iPhone
-- Peter
pjfra...@ma
e Tucker
via Phono-L
*Sent:*Saturday, May 04, 2019 6:13 PM
*To:*'Antique Phonograph List'
*Cc:*mtucker1...@gmail.com <mailto:mtucker1...@gmail.com>
*Subject:*Re: [Phono-L] Little Wonder Phono problems
Ron,
What is the width of the spring?
The Windso
Of Peter Fraser
via Phono-L
Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2019 11:49 PM
To: Antique Phonograph List
Cc: Peter Fraser
Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Little Wonder Phono problems
I’m still here too!
Sent from my iPhone
-- Peter
pjfra...@mac.com
On May 7, 2019, at 8:33 PM, Jim Nichol via Phono-L wrote
Thanks Jim.
Ron
From: Phono-L [mailto:phono-l-boun...@oldcrank.org] On Behalf Of Jim Nichol via
Phono-L
Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2019 11:34 PM
To: Antique Phonograph List
Cc: Jim Nichol
Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Little Wonder Phono problems
Ron, I doubt you and Mike are the only people
>>
>> Looks like you and I are the only ones on the oldcrank phonograph list. NO
>> one else commented.
>>
>>
>> Ron L
>>
>> From: Phono-L [mailto:phono-l-boun...@oldcrank.org] On Behalf Of Mike Tucker
>> via Phono-L
>> S
boun...@oldcrank.org>] On Behalf Of Mike Tucker via Phono-L
> Sent: Saturday, May 04, 2019 6:13 PM
> To: 'Antique Phonograph List'
> Cc: mtucker1...@gmail.com <mailto:mtucker1...@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Little Wonder Phono problems
>
> Ron,
>
&g
PM
To: 'Antique Phonograph List'
Cc: mtucker1...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Little Wonder Phono problems
Ron,
What is the width of the spring?
The Windsor listing gives the following for small toy motors (Genola, Baby
Grand,Carryola Cub, Pei-o-phone, Artone, Feather
@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Little Wonder Phono problems
Ron,
What is the width of the spring?
The Windsor listing gives the following for small toy motors (Genola, Baby
Grand,Carryola Cub, Pei-o-phone, Artone, Featherweight etc) with pear shape
holes as ½ x .022 x 8feet.
Fo
Ron,
What is the width of the spring?
The Windsor listing gives the following for small toy motors (Genola, Baby
Grand,Carryola Cub, Pei-o-phone, Artone, Featherweight etc) with pear shape
holes as ½ x .022 x 8feet.
For old type toy motors the dimensions are 9/16 x .025 x 10 feet.
14 matches
Mail list logo