Derick,
I suggest to just rm -rf it from the repository and have him recommit
it to PECL.
Andi
At 03:26 PM 1/30/2006, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jan 2006, Derick Rethans wrote:
> The process is more:
> - add extension to PECL
> - develop it there, make it stable
> - contact internals@
On Mon, 30 Jan 2006, Derick Rethans wrote:
> The process is more:
> - add extension to PECL
> - develop it there, make it stable
> - contact internals@ and figure out if there is a concesus of adding it
>
> For now, it's definitely not stable, and there is no censensus either.
> Shall I move the
Seems like your commit screwed up the copyright notice. Did you
commit ancient code? :)
- | Copyright (c) 1997-2006 The PHP Group|
+ | Copyright (c) 1997-2003 The PHP Group|
+-
tony2001Mon Jan 30 21:14:54 2006 UTC
Modified files: (Branch: PHP_5_1)
/php-src/ext/reflection php_reflection.c
Log:
fix printf-style formats
http://cvs.php.net/viewcvs.cgi/php-src/ext/reflection/php_reflection.c?r1=1.164.2.18&r2=1.164.2.19&diff_fo
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> I wouldn't say "rock" per se, but I have not had the opportunity to work
>> on PHP extensions in a few years, jeez, at least 3. Anyway it has been a
>> while.
>>
>> How and with whom do we try/poll for concensus?
>
> The internals mailing list, the one you supposedly u
On Mon, 30 Jan 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> Sorry about that but I tried a few weeks ago to as ask a question of
> >> php-dev and noone responded. Anyway, what is the procedure for future
> >> reference?
> >
> > Lack of replies does not indicate implicit permissi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wouldn't say "rock" per se, but I have not had the opportunity to work
on PHP extensions in a few years, jeez, at least 3. Anyway it has been a
while.
How and with whom do we try/poll for concensus?
The internals mailing list, the one you supposedly used to ask about
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Sorry about that but I tried a few weeks ago to as ask a question of
>> php-dev and noone responded. Anyway, what is the procedure for future
>> reference?
>
> Lack of replies does not indicate implicit permission. Since about 2
> years, ALL new extensions no matter ho
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry about that but I tried a few weeks ago to as ask a question of
php-dev and noone responded. Anyway, what is the procedure for future
reference?
Lack of replies does not indicate implicit permission. Since about 2
years, ALL new extensions no matter how useful the
On Mon, 30 Jan 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Sat, 28 Jan 2006, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
> >
> >> Why was this committed to core and not to pecl, as is the procedure for
> >> all
> >> new extensions?
> >
> > Yes, indeed... why is was this suddenly committed to core?!
>
> Sorry about that but
> On Sat, 28 Jan 2006, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
>
>> Why was this committed to core and not to pecl, as is the procedure for
>> all
>> new extensions?
>
> Yes, indeed... why is was this suddenly committed to core?!
>
Sorry about that but I tried a few weeks ago to as ask a question of
php-dev and n
On Mon, 30 Jan 2006, Mark L. Woodward wrote:
> mlwmohawk Mon Jan 30 16:20:02 2006 UTC
>
> Modified files:
> /php-src/ext/xmldbx xmldbx.c
> Log:
> Added thread stuff for --enable-pcntl
Can you please reply to the mails about why you added this to the cor
mlwmohawk Mon Jan 30 16:20:02 2006 UTC
Modified files:
/php-src/ext/xmldbx xmldbx.c
Log:
Added thread stuff for --enable-pcntl
http://cvs.php.net/viewcvs.cgi/php-src/ext/xmldbx/xmldbx.c?r1=1.1&r2=1.2&diff_format=u
Index: php-src/ext/xmldbx/xmldbx.c
diff
iliaa Mon Jan 30 15:31:10 2006 UTC
Modified files: (Branch: PHP_4_4)
/php-src/main main.c
Log:
Fixed error reporting logic for HTML errors
http://cvs.php.net/viewcvs.cgi/php-src/main/main.c?r1=1.512.2.63.2.8&r2=1.512.2.63.2.9&diff_format=u
Index: php-s
14 matches
Mail list logo
