Hello Rob --
Are you sure this is right? The xmlns prefix is supposed to be bound
to http://www.w3.org/2000/xmlns/, so I would think you would need to
use getAttributeNS() here.
Or are you allowed to use getAttribute() to pull out namespaced
attributes with prefixes?
Either way, what's the
I think using namespace URI will also help us out with default
namespaces because they don't have a ns prefix.
-adam
On Fri, 14 Apr 2006, Rob Richards wrote:
Hi Marcus,
I think it would be better to speficy namespace URI rather than prefix.
Prefix can be anything, so unless you know what
On Tue, 9 Aug 2005, Andrei Zmievski wrote:
Yep, those are the bigs ones. The merge won't happen until a day or two
from now (struggling with stupid 'patch' program), but please, don't
commit anything in those areas.
If only Rasmus had written patch instead of Larry, then patch would be
PHP's
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
On Sun, 17 Jul 2005, Marcus Boerger wrote:
Log:
- If you ask me both (expat and libxml) are not really accurate about byte
positions
This isn't checked in where you want it to be, is it?
-adam
On Sat, 5 Mar 2005, John Coggeshall wrote:
john Fri Mar 4 20:13:10 2005 EDT
Modified files:
/php-src/ext/skeleton/tests 001.phpt
Log:
Starting tests
On Wed, 1 Dec 2004, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
dmitryWed Dec 1 11:59:23 2004 EDT
Modified files: (Branch: PHP_5_0)
/php-src NEWS
/php-src/ext/soap php_http.c
Log:
Fixed bug #30359 (SOAP client requests have no port in Host field ).
[snip]
On Wed, 8 Sep 2004, Andi Gutmans wrote:
Yep I concur. No need to bloat the code base for no good reason.
Whoever needs the flexibility you are talking of can use CURL.
Maybe another alternative would be to revive the cURL wrappers
project? That would give us the benefits of being able to
On Mon, 29 Mar 2004, Hartmut Holzgraefe wrote:
+/*
+this test works fine with Expat but fails with libxml
+which we now use as default
+
+further investigation has shown that not only line count
+is skippet on CDATA sections but that libxml does also
+show different column numbers and byte
On Sun, 22 Feb 2004, Christian Stocker wrote:
mmmh, forget about that... I used 2.6.2, will test on 2.5.10 later
I think SAX2 support began with 2.6.0, but maybe you can enable SAX 1
usage for older version?
-adam
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
author of o'reilly's php cookbook
avoid the holiday rush,
On Sat, 17 Jan 2004, Sterling Hughes wrote:
namespace accesses are now soley URI based as opposed to prefix based.
Sterling --
This patch breaks xpath() because you can no longer access nodes in a
default namespace. You *need* to register a prefix for them or XPath
thinks you're searching
On Sat, 17 Jan 2004, Sterling Hughes wrote:
How about we provide an array of aliases to the xpath() function? This
will avoid nasty refcounting as well.
xpath('/foo:bar', array('foo' = 'http://www.example.org/foo'));
Sounds good.
-adam
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
author of o'reilly's php
On Sun, 28 Sep 2003, Dennis Sterzenbach wrote:
snip
checking libxml2 install dir... no
configure: error: libxml2 version 2.5.10 or greater required.
/snip
Have you checked that the output of xml2-config --version says that
you're running libxml2 2.5.10 or greater? I bet you need to upgrade
On Sun, 2 Mar 2003, Marcus Börger wrote:
At 11:19 02.03.2003, Zeev Suraski wrote:
zeevSun Mar 2 05:19:17 2003 EDT
Log:
Add JIT initialization for _SERVER and _ENV
(it's less important for the others, even though it should be fairly
easy now too)
argc/v foes no
This patch, or at least this part:
-#ifdef HAVE_GD_XPM
+#if defined(HAVE_GD_XPM) defined(HAVE_GD_BUNDLED)
Needs to be merged into the 4.3.0. Something in the build broke my GD
support between RC2 and RC3. This fixes it.
-adam
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
iliaa Wed
On Sun, 1 Dec 2002, Shane Caraveo wrote:
shane Sun Dec 1 16:37:14 2002 EDT
Modified files:
/php4/mainconfig.w32.h.in win95nt.h
/php4/sapi/cgicgi_main.c
/php4/sapi/cgi/libfcgifcgiapp.c
/php4/sapi/cgi/libfcgi/includefcgiapp.h
On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, Marcus Börger wrote:
Shouldn't we allow - in %i, too?
I would like the following:
%i = [+\-]?[0-9]+
%d = [0-9]+
%f = [+\-]?\.?[0-9]+\.?[0-9]*
Isn't there a spec for printf() style options? These may be good
settings, but I think it's much better to follow the
16 matches
Mail list logo
