Hi!
> I checked with Stas and he said ok for 5.4.
Looks like there's a disagreement about this one and whether it should
be in hash or openssl, so I'll revert this for now from 5.4 and after we
discuss it on internals and decide where we want it, we'll decide where
it goes. Sorry for misunderstan
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 4:50 PM, Scott MacVicar wrote:
> I checked with Stas and he said ok for 5.4.
Make it public next time. RFC says no new feature but very very small
ones. RMs apply this rule.
--
Pierre
@pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org
--
PHP CVS Mailing List
I checked with Stas and he said ok for 5.4.
On 12 Jun 2012, at 06:08, David Soria Parra wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Stas did you ACK that change? It seems rather intrusive and I am not
> sure if we want that in a minor version just 24 h before releasing.
> can w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stas did you ACK that change? It seems rather intrusive and I am not
sure if we want that in a minor version just 24 h before releasing.
can we solve that before tagging 5.4.4?
thx
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 1:04 AM, Scott MacVicar
> wrote:
>> Commit
hi,
This is a new feature, what does it do in 5.4? Also it was clearly not
tested (did not build with < 1.0.0 f.e.). I am totally not in favour
of having that in 5.4 yet, even if it looks non intrusive. The overall
stability and reliability is a key, not only specific functions.
Cheers,
On Tue,
Commit:bcd671d999bcb9aac3691c59e632d91575ea87a0
Author:Scott MacVicar Mon, 11 Jun 2012 16:04:01
-0700
Parents: aadf59dfa4be09147671de33786dc157716705df
bccd1e672fabc3c788e93075221d47d9f077b167
Branches: master
Link:
http://git.php.net/?p=php-src.git;a=commitdiff;h=bcd6
Commit:32040b574e7b456ca7b03918adaabfec4bbd91e2
Author:Scott MacVicar Mon, 11 Jun 2012 00:29:02
-0700
Parents: 2065bab102d2117340d5b604f0ac55941c78ced8
f4847efc5d58b3375fa0f3269158d5e6ab625c21
Branches: master
Link:
http://git.php.net/?p=php-src.git;a=commitdiff;h=3204
