iliaa Mon Mar 6 14:27:46 2006 UTC
Modified files:
/php-src/ext/standard basic_functions.c basic_functions.h file.c
/php-srcNEWS
Log:
Fixed bug #36630 (umask not reset at the end of the request).
# This needs to be MFHed, but since it
iliaa Sun Apr 10 12:25:11 2005 EDT
Modified files:
/php-srcNEWS
/php-src/ext/standard basic_functions.c basic_functions.h
Log:
Added time_sleep_until() function, which is a high precision mechanism of
making a script sleep until specified
On Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 04:25:11PM -, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
iliaa Sun Apr 10 12:25:11 2005 EDT
Modified files:
/php-src NEWS
/php-src/ext/standard basic_functions.c basic_functions.h
Log:
Added time_sleep_until() function, which is a high
iliaa Wed Apr 6 10:19:14 2005 EDT
Modified files:
/php-srcNEWS
/php-src/ext/standard basic_functions.c basic_functions.h
Log:
Removed php_check_syntax() function, it never worked properly. For now
use shell_exec(php -l script_name) or similar.
pollita Sat Aug 7 00:50:25 2004 EDT
Modified files:
/php-src/ext/standard basic_functions.c basic_functions.h
/php-srcNEWS
Log:
New Functions inet_pton() and inet_ntop()
On 2003/11/14, at 8:24, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
On November 13, 2003 05:54 pm, you wrote:
Again, this is breaking our naming conventions. (yeah I know there's
legacy
stuff).
How about time_nanosleeop()?
Heh, I can't ever seem to get the names right. That said, I think in
this case
it would be
At 02:12 PM 11/14/2003 -0500, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
On November 14, 2003 06:19 am, Andi Gutmans wrote:
Yes, but that is concerning legacy functions when we were too dumb to do
the right thing.
I don't think the old method of function naming is necessarily bad. If
anything it helps people who
iliaa Fri Nov 14 17:55:55 2003 EDT
Modified files:
/php-srcNEWS
/php-src/ext/standard basic_functions.c basic_functions.h
Log:
Rename nanosleep() to time_nanosleep().
Index: php-src/NEWS
diff -u php-src/NEWS:1.1498 php-src/NEWS:1.1499
---
Thanks.
At 10:55 PM 11/14/2003 +, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
iliaa Fri Nov 14 17:55:55 2003 EDT
Modified files:
/php-srcNEWS
/php-src/ext/standard basic_functions.c basic_functions.h
Log:
Rename nanosleep() to time_nanosleep().
Index: php-src/NEWS
diff -u
At 06:14 PM 11/12/2003 -0500, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
On November 12, 2003 06:02 pm, Moriyoshi Koizumi wrote:
Hmm, did you ever think of an idea of allowing float values for usleep()
instead of adding one more redundancy to the existing two look-alikes?
Actually I have, but you'll notice that
At 06:50 PM 11/12/2003 -0500, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
On November 12, 2003 06:34 pm, Moriyoshi Koizumi wrote:Moriyoshi
I think it'd rather belong to a matter of stupidity that the user has to
choose the available function in order to accomplish a common purpose.
Actually they don't act like one
iliaa Wed Nov 12 17:02:38 2003 EDT
Modified files:
/php-srcNEWS
/php-src/ext/standard basic_functions.c basic_functions.h
Log:
Added nanosleep(), in addition to allowing setting of very short states.
This function is signal safe.
Index:
Hmm, did you ever think of an idea of allowing float values for usleep()
instead of adding one more redundancy to the existing two look-alikes?
Moriyoshi
On 2003/11/13, at 7:02, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
iliaa Wed Nov 12 17:02:38 2003 EDT
Modified files:
/php-src NEWS
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 10:02:38PM -, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
iliaa Wed Nov 12 17:02:38 2003 EDT
Modified files:
/php-src NEWS
/php-src/ext/standard basic_functions.c basic_functions.h
Log:
Added nanosleep(), in addition to allowing setting of
On November 12, 2003 06:02 pm, Moriyoshi Koizumi wrote:
Hmm, did you ever think of an idea of allowing float values for usleep()
instead of adding one more redundancy to the existing two look-alikes?
Actually I have, but you'll notice that unlike other sleep functions
nanosleep() can return an
On 2003/11/13, at 8:14, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
On November 12, 2003 06:02 pm, Moriyoshi Koizumi wrote:
Hmm, did you ever think of an idea of allowing float values for
usleep()
instead of adding one more redundancy to the existing two look-alikes?
Actually I have, but you'll notice that unlike
On November 12, 2003 06:16 pm, Moriyoshi Koizumi wrote:
Well, then it looks like I have to wonder, if there is any option to
get them combined into an unified function, hopefully by deprecating
two of those?
What would be the advantage of such an approach? Code wise you won't gain any
On 2003/11/13, at 8:31, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
On November 12, 2003 06:16 pm, Moriyoshi Koizumi wrote:
Well, then it looks like I have to wonder, if there is any option to
get them combined into an unified function, hopefully by deprecating
two of those?
What would be the advantage of such an
Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
On November 12, 2003 06:34 pm, Moriyoshi Koizumi wrote:Moriyoshi
I think it'd rather belong to a matter of stupidity that the user has to
choose the available function in order to accomplish a common purpose.
Actually they don't act like one another though.
Well,
On November 12, 2003 06:58 pm, Nathan Sullivan wrote:
In my opinion as a user, I would say allow sleep() to accept floats, and
depreciate usleep(). If sleep() is implemented with nanosleep() anyway,
is there a point to having both?
Yes, some systems do not have nanosleep, in those cases
20 matches
Mail list logo
