On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 09:03:59 +0200 (CEST), Derick Rethans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Oct 2004, Rob Richards wrote:
>
> > I can possibly see removing a few of the props/methods - ones which have the
> > exact same functionality and aren't standardly used, but then should these
> > change
On Thu, 7 Oct 2004, Rob Richards wrote:
> I can possibly see removing a few of the props/methods - ones which have the
> exact same functionality and aren't standardly used, but then should these
> changes be made to the 5_0 branch as well? - Would propose any of these
> changes on the xml-dev lis
On Thursday 07 October 2004 05:59 pm, Marcus Boerger wrote:
> It makes little to no sense to keep names for BC in an extension that uses
> names based on a spec. Especially when the old names were never published
> as a valid spec. Those names would only blow up the namesspace and lead to
> confus
Hello Rob,
Thursday, October 7, 2004, 1:40:24 PM, you wrote:
> rrichards Thu Oct 7 07:40:24 2004 EDT
> Modified files:
> /php-src/ext/dom document.c php_dom.c text.c
> Log:
> add DOMDocument xmlEncoding, xmlStandalone, xmlVersion (spec name changes)
> add
rrichards Thu Oct 7 07:40:24 2004 EDT
Modified files:
/php-src/ext/domdocument.c php_dom.c text.c
Log:
add DOMDocument xmlEncoding, xmlStandalone, xmlVersion (spec name changes)
add DOMText isElementContentWhitespace (spec name change)
- old props/m
