OK in that case it's probably best not to add inconsistency and leave
it this way.
At 12:44 AM 1/25/2006, Marcus Boerger wrote:
Hello Andi,
it was Sebastians idea and he took the name from invokeArgs().
I don't care, so if you can sleep better with your proposal change both
names and live wi
Hello Andi,
it was Sebastians idea and he took the name from invokeArgs().
I don't care, so if you can sleep better with your proposal change both
names and live with BC break.
marcus
Wednesday, January 25, 2006, 3:46:16 AM, you wrote:
> Might be nicer to call it newInstanceWithArgs() but it'
Might be nicer to call it newInstanceWithArgs() but it's a matter of
taste so I'll leave it up to you to decide if you think it's nicer or not :)
Andi
At 12:19 PM 1/24/2006, Marcus Boerger wrote:
helly Tue Jan 24 20:19:49 2006 UTC
Added files:
/php-src/ext/reflection/tests
helly Tue Jan 24 20:19:49 2006 UTC
Added files:
/php-src/ext/reflection/tests 007.phpt
Modified files:
/php-src/ext/reflection php_reflection.c
Log:
- Implemented #36141 Add ReflectionClass::newInstanceArgs($args)
http://c
