Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4 /ext/standard basic_functions.c php_string.h string.c

2002-10-18 Thread Jon Parise
On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 12:22:10AM +0200, Andi Gutmans wrote: > This should follow naming standards and start with str_ We also ready have 'wordwrap'. This adds 'word_count'. You suggest staying with 'str_'. I think, whatever is decided, we should commit to using one notation. -- Jon Pari

RE: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4 /ext/standard basic_functions.c php_string.h string.c

2002-10-18 Thread Sean R. Bright
The proto description needs to be on one line IIRC. Sean > -Original Message- > From: Ilia Alshanetsky [mailto:ilia@;prohost.org] > Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 6:45 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4 /ext/standard basic_functions.c > php_string.h string.c >

Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4 /ext/standard basic_functions.c php_string.h string.c

2002-10-18 Thread Ilia A.
I'll correct the name of the function I've added, I applogize for the oversight. I do not think we should rename existing functions because it would break BC and force us add to add even more function aliases. We already have 400+ function alises in PHP, lets try avoiding adding new ones unless

Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4 /ext/standard basic_functions.c php_string.h string.c

2002-09-25 Thread Andrey Hristov
ot;Andrey Hristov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 10:11 PM Subject: Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4 /ext/standard basic_functions.c php_string.h string.c > I think it would be better to either use a correct algorithm or not to > ad