Re: [PHP-CVS] Discuss on php-dev, not on php-cvs please

2002-10-29 Thread Sascha Schumann
> Fine with me too. On a second thought, people like me who commit changes and are not subscribed to php-dev, would not receive the replies which are intended for them, if follow-ups would be automatically directed to php-dev. Hence, the current way is good. I didn't have any

Re: [PHP-CVS] Discuss on php-dev, not on php-cvs please

2002-10-29 Thread Derick Rethans
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Sascha Schumann wrote: > > I think we can instruct the listmanager to set a Reply-To header > > instead, would that be a nice idea? > > Nope, > > http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html > > When I was still subscribed to php-cvs, I frequently replied >

Re: [PHP-CVS] Discuss on php-dev, not on php-cvs please

2002-10-29 Thread Sascha Schumann
> I think we can instruct the listmanager to set a Reply-To header > instead, would that be a nice idea? Nope, http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html When I was still subscribed to php-cvs, I frequently replied to people in private. Munging reply-to would make that a lot

Re: [PHP-CVS] Discuss on php-dev, not on php-cvs please

2002-10-29 Thread Derick Rethans
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Wez Furlong wrote: > Hey guys, > > If you need to comment on a commit, can you please change the To/Cc line > from php-cvs to php-dev. > > It makes trawling through the commits quite hard when there are > massively long threads in there that should really be discussed in the