At 9:05 AM +0100 6/22/01, Russ Michell wrote:
> > Is this a new use of the function mysql_num_rows?
>No!.
It's not a change in syntax, but it is a change in PHP's behavior.
In PHP 4, mysql_num_rows() and mysql_num_fields() will issue error
messages if the argument is not a result set. In PHP 3
> Is this a new use of the function mysql_num_rows?
No!
You can use the @ to 'suppress error messages' that may reveal
delicate information to users such as paths to directories on your
server. It can be preppended to almost any php function likely to
result in an error, if used incorrectly.
ía Ferrari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: PHP List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Friday, June 22, 2001 7:33 AM
Subject: [PHP-DB] MySQL connection: Change on syntaxis?
Hello,
I updated php to version 4.0.5 and MySQL to version 2.32.39, had errors on
lines like this:
$rows = mysql_num_rows(
Subject: [PHP-DB] MySQL connection: Change on syntaxis?
Hello,
I updated php to version 4.0.5 and MySQL to version 2.32.39, had errors on
lines like this:
$rows = mysql_num_rows($result);
and noticed that this is a solution:
$rows = @mysql_num_rows($result);
Is this a new use of the
on 6/21/01 2:30 PM, Tomás García Ferrari at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I updated php to version 4.0.5 and MySQL to version 2.32.39, had errors on
> lines like this:
>
> $rows = mysql_num_rows($result);
>
> and noticed that this is a solution:
>
> $rows = @mysql_num_rows($result);
>
> Is t
Tomás García Ferrari pressed the little lettered thingies in this order...
> Hello,
>
> I updated php to version 4.0.5 and MySQL to version 2.32.39, had errors on
> lines like this:
>
> $rows = mysql_num_rows($result);
>
> and noticed that this is a solution:
>
> $rows = @mysql_num_ro
Hello,
I updated php to version 4.0.5 and MySQL to version 2.32.39, had errors on
lines like this:
$rows = mysql_num_rows($result);
and noticed that this is a solution:
$rows = @mysql_num_rows($result);
Is this a new use of the function mysql_num_rows?
+--
