Hi,
can someone state the technical problems we're facing? I'ld
rather see this documented (whether it works or no, but
documenting).
- Markus
On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 08:04:25AM +0200, Derick Rethans wrote :
Hello,
as far as I know this never worked, the wisest thing
On Fri, 10 May 2002, Markus Fischer wrote:
Hi,
can someone state the technical problems we're facing? I'ld
rather see this documented (whether it works or no, but
documenting).
print is implemented in the scanner level as token (T_PRINT) and that
prohibits it for use as
Hi all,
Here are the two SAPI apps I wrote recently to help me to use the PHP more
productively.
The first is php_srv, and enables me to run the script as windows service,
or as standard console application.
It has the --install, --install-auto, --remove service management options,
and
Hi,
$ php -v
4.3.0-dev (cli)
but
$ php -m
Running PHP 4.3.0-dev
Zend Engine v2.0.0-dev, Copyright (c) 1998-2002 Zend
Technologies
[PHP Modules]
xml
tokenizer
standard
session
posix
pcre
overload
mysql
mbstring
ctype
On Fri, 10 May 2002, Markus Fischer wrote:
[...]
Shouldn't we move the Zend Engine version output to php -v
too and let -m only list the modules -v only all the version
numbers ?
Sounds like a good idea to me, and then we can also output the 3 different
kidns of API NOs to php
Is it impossible to make it a language construct as well as a function?
Manuzhai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
On Fri, 10 May 2002, Markus Fischer wrote:
Hi,
can someone state the technical problems we're facing? I'ld
wow that's nice!
fab.
- Original Message -
From: Mladen Turk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PHP dev list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 6:08 AM
Subject: [PHP-DEV] Some WIN contrib
Hi all,
Here are the two SAPI apps I wrote recently to help me to use the PHP more
productively.
Cant we do both.. keep the scaner token and introduce the function?
- Brad
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 10 May 2002, Markus Fischer wrote:
Hi,
can someone state the technical problems we're facing? I'ld
rather see this documented (whether it works or no, but
On Fri, 10 May 2002, brad lafountain wrote:
Cant we do both.. keep the scaner token and introduce the function?
What would you reach by introducing such a mess?
Derick
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 10 May 2002, Markus Fischer wrote:
Hi,
can someone state the
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 10 May 2002, brad lafountain wrote:
Cant we do both.. keep the scaner token and introduce the function?
What would you reach by introducing such a mess?
I dont' think its too much of a mess
PHP_FUNCTION(echo)
{
char *mess;
int mess_len;
On Fri, 10 May 2002, brad lafountain wrote:
I dont' think its too much of a mess
PHP_FUNCTION(echo)
{
char *mess;
int mess_len;
if(zend_parse_parameters(*) == SUCCESS)
php_write(buf, size TSRMLS_CC);
}
What you gain is allowing people to do the following code and you don't
phpdoc - Help with the hebrew translation of the PHP manual.
pear - Hopefully, help in the development of pear (contribute some classes that I
wrote).
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
May I ask, how many people have CVS accounts with commital access? (I just
see an awful lot of account requests and was interested)
--
Dan Hardiker [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
ADAM Software Systems Engineer
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit:
There are currently 522 CVS accounts most of which have commit access to
something.
On Fri, 10 May 2002, Dan Hardiker wrote:
May I ask, how many people have CVS accounts with commital access? (I just
see an awful lot of account requests and was interested)
--
Dan Hardiker [[EMAIL
Hi,
I've modified the out now to look something like
$ php -v
PHP 4.3.0-dev (cli)
Zend Engine v1.2.1, Copyright (c) 1998-2002 Zend Technologies
Derick suggested also to add some other internal version
numbers like module about for both PHP and Zend.
We just
Hello php-dev,
Why How this code will work?
?
function foo($flag)
{
return $flag;
}
$a=TRUE;
echo if (!\$a = foo(FALSE))) is ;
if (!$a = foo(FALSE))
echo true;
else
echo false;
echo \n;
var_dump($a);
echo \n;
?
Output:
if (!$a =
Last summer I sent in some patches to speed up the IMAP module's dealing
with large mailboxes. At the time I noted that there were similar
problems with other parts of the module, but I didn't have time to fix
them then.
Since I still see the problems in 4.2.0 (and I've suddenly had a need to
Markus Fischer wrote:
Hi,
I've modified the out now to look something like
$ php -v
PHP 4.3.0-dev (cli)
Zend Engine v1.2.1, Copyright (c) 1998-2002 Zend Technologies
Derick suggested also to add some other internal version
numbers like module about for
:
$ php -v
PHP 4.3.0-dev (cli)
Zend Engine v1.2.1, Copyright (c) 1998-2002 Zend Technologies
PHP_VERSION_API 20020510
ZEND_EXTENSION_API_NO 20020510
ZEND_MODULE_API_NO 20020510
?
Hmm, now looking again, this looks ugly :) Would it make
sense to have
$ php
, Copyright (c) 1998-2002 Zend Technologies
PHP_VERSION_API 20020510
ZEND_EXTENSION_API_NO 20020510
ZEND_MODULE_API_NO 20020510
Or is this just unnecessary bloat and let's fire all versions
we have to standard output with -v ?
It looks great to have -v and -vv options.
--
Yasuo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 10 May 2002, brad lafountain wrote:
I dont' think its too much of a mess
PHP_FUNCTION(echo)
{
char *mess;
int mess_len;
if(zend_parse_parameters(*) == SUCCESS)
php_write(buf, size TSRMLS_CC);
}
What you gain is allowing people to do the following
$ php -v
PHP 4.3.0-dev (cli)
Zend Engine v1.2.1, Copyright (c) 1998-2002 Zend Technologies
PHP_VERSION_API 20020510
ZEND_EXTENSION_API_NO 20020510
ZEND_MODULE_API_NO 20020510
?
Hmm, now looking again, this looks ugly :) Would it make
sense to have
On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 04:22:48AM +0200, Edin Kadribasic wrote :
$ php -v
PHP 4.3.0-dev (cli)
Zend Engine v1.2.1, Copyright (c) 1998-2002 Zend Technologies
PHP_VERSION_API 20020510
ZEND_EXTENSION_API_NO 20020510
ZEND_MODULE_API_NO 20020510
$ php -vv
PHP 4.3.0-dev (cli), Copyright (c) 1997-2002 The PHP Group
Zend Engine v1.2.1, Copyright (c) 1998-2002 Zend Technologies
PHP_VERSION_API 20020510
ZEND_EXTENSION_API_NO 20020510
ZEND_MODULE_API_NO 20020510
On second thought, do we really need this. Can you
Edin Kadribasic wrote:
$ php -vv
PHP 4.3.0-dev (cli), Copyright (c) 1997-2002 The PHP Group
Zend Engine v1.2.1, Copyright (c) 1998-2002 Zend Technologies
PHP_VERSION_API 20020510
ZEND_EXTENSION_API_NO 20020510
ZEND_MODULE_API_NO 20020510
On second thought, do we
On Sat, 11 May 2002, Markus Fischer wrote:
$ php -v
PHP 4.3.0-dev (cli)
Zend Engine v1.2.1, Copyright (c) 1998-2002 Zend Technologies
PHP_VERSION_API 20020510
ZEND_EXTENSION_API_NO 20020510
ZEND_MODULE_API_NO 20020510
While this may look ugly, I'd say stick
On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 12:33:21AM -0400, Dan Kalowsky wrote :
On Sat, 11 May 2002, Markus Fischer wrote:
$ php -v
PHP 4.3.0-dev (cli)
Zend Engine v1.2.1, Copyright (c) 1998-2002 Zend Technologies
PHP_VERSION_API 20020510
ZEND_EXTENSION_API_NO 20020510
27 matches
Mail list logo
