On Wed, 27 Nov 2002, Sascha Schumann wrote:
On Wed, 27 Nov 2002, Stig S. Bakken wrote:
On Tue, 2002-11-26 at 14:57, Andrei Zmievski wrote:
On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, Edin Kadribasic wrote:
On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, Maxim Maletsky wrote:
I rather propose. And, it seems to interest many on
-1 on errno-style error codes. They are not versatile
enough or easy to manage.
They are a lot more versatile and manageable than having to use
substring/regexp matching on human-readable text.
What I'm going for here is a way for scripts to detect _why_ fopen fails,
other than
On Wed, 27 Nov 2002, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Wed, 27 Nov 2002, Sara Pollita Golemon wrote:
User complains that maximum length of a line used by fscanf is too short
(he has lines 1600 chars). Looking at file.h I agree (it's only 512).
The user requested two options:
1) Add an
On Sat, 30 Nov 2002, Stig S. Bakken wrote:
4) Make sure we can use fscanf on a dynamically sized buffer. This will
definitely the hardest solution, but also the most beautiful one.
[4] is definitely the best option. formatted_print.c already does
something similar.
Stig, it's already
On Sat, 30 Nov 2002, Sascha Schumann wrote:
-1 on errno-style error codes. They are not versatile
enough or easy to manage.
They are a lot more versatile and manageable than having to use
substring/regexp matching on human-readable text.
What I'm going for here is a way
At 12:00 30.11.2002, Sascha Schumann wrote:
-1 on errno-style error codes. They are not versatile
enough or easy to manage.
They are a lot more versatile and manageable than having to use
substring/regexp matching on human-readable text.
What I'm going for here is a way for
Anyone know how to allow pre 4.0.3 code which was written when you could
call get parsed variables as $variable etc tyo work on the new version of
php which doesnt allow this ???
Thanks
Ben Paul
Proactive Innovations LTD
www.proactiveinnovations.co.uk
--
PHP Development Mailing List
We talkes about this at our March Doc meeting. The problem is that the
different doc systems mostly started out from the initial phpdoc
repositories system, and developed on their own ways. Reuniting the build
systems under one umbrella would be quite a hard task, and I don't know who
can
At 12:27 PM 11/30/02 +, Benjamin Paul wrote:
Anyone know how to allow pre 4.0.3 code which was written when you could
call get parsed variables as $variable etc tyo work on the new version of
php which doesnt allow this ???
This really belongs on the php-general list, this list is for the
PHP 4 Bug Database summary - http://bugs.php.net
Num Status Summary (1012 total including feature requests)
===[*Configuration Issues]
13561 Assigned --without-pear prevent install of php-config,phpize,...
19282 Won't fix Place
Is there any reason the ifdef __cplusplus doesn't work? There shouldn't
be any need for extra processing or config options.
J Smith wrote:
How about adding something like this to skeleton.c:
/* __begin_extern_c__ */
/* __end_extern_c__ */
And having the sed script in ext_skel replace them
Andi Gutmans wrote:
andiSat Nov 30 05:51:56 2002 EDT
Modified files:
/Zend zend.c zend.h zend_builtin_functions.c
Log:
- debug_print_backtrace (by George Schlossnagle [EMAIL PROTECTED])
MFH?
--
Sebastian Bergmann
http://sebastian-bergmann.de/
At 17:05 30.11.2002, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
Andi Gutmans wrote:
andiSat Nov 30 05:51:56 2002 EDT
Modified files:
/Zend zend.c zend.h zend_builtin_functions.c
Log:
- debug_print_backtrace (by George Schlossnagle [EMAIL PROTECTED])
MFH?
New functionality?
Is there any reason the ifdef __cplusplus doesn't work? There shouldn't
be any need for extra processing or config options.
well, i think c++ code might confuse people just starting out writing a C
extension...
-Sterling
J Smith wrote:
How about adding something like this to skeleton.c:
At 18:07 30.11.2002, Sterling Hughes wrote:
Is there any reason the ifdef __cplusplus doesn't work? There shouldn't
be any need for extra processing or config options.
well, i think c++ code might confuse people just starting out writing a C
extension...
-Sterling
But there are more
Marcus Börger wrote:
New functionality?
It vitaly improves new functionality (debug_backtrace()).
--
Sebastian Bergmann
http://sebastian-bergmann.de/ http://phpOpenTracker.de/
Did I help you? Consider a gift: http://wishlist.sebastian-bergmann.de/
--
PHP Development
On Sat, 30 Nov 2002, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
Marcus Börger wrote:
New functionality?
It vitaly improves new functionality (debug_backtrace()).
IMO it's too late; we're in RC2 already.
Derick
--
-
Derick
Hey all
I was playing around and I'm running into a problem with a hashtable...
Basically, it's segfaulting my code :) Specifically, I'm trying to
return the number of items in the hash...
if(zend_hash_num_elements(hash) == 0)
Which causes the following:
Program received signal SIGSEGV,
On Sat, 30 Nov 2002, John Coggeshall wrote:
Hey all
I was playing around and I'm running into a problem with a hashtable...
Basically, it's segfaulting my code :) Specifically, I'm trying to
return the number of items in the hash...
if(zend_hash_num_elements(hash) == 0)
Which causes
Following patch allows longer error messages within Zend.
marcus
cvs -z3 -q diff zend.c (in directory S:\php4-HEAD\Zend)
Index: zend.c
===
RCS file: /repository/ZendEngine2/zend.c,v
retrieving revision 1.193
diff -u -r1.193 zend.c
Hey,
I was checking the CVS logs, and I read ::
revision 1.13
date: 2001/11/26 17:27:59; author: andi; state: Exp; lines: +1 -1
- Turn off fast cache until we make sure it performs well.
- The best solution is probably to limit its size.
I was just wondering what was wrong, and what it would
At 02:59 PM 11/30/2002 -0500, Sterling Hughes wrote:
Hey,
I was checking the CVS logs, and I read ::
revision 1.13
date: 2001/11/26 17:27:59; author: andi; state: Exp; lines: +1 -1
- Turn off fast cache until we make sure it performs well.
- The best solution is probably to limit its size.
At 02:59 PM 11/30/2002 -0500, Sterling Hughes wrote:
Hey,
I was checking the CVS logs, and I read ::
revision 1.13
date: 2001/11/26 17:27:59; author: andi; state: Exp; lines: +1 -1
- Turn off fast cache until we make sure it performs well.
- The best solution is probably to limit its
How does searching the freelist work in this? How is this faster than
say a 3-level page table implementation?
That said, I do think that if we can get very fast code to pre-allocate
zval's it would be a good idea (hopefully we could get more than 5%
increase).
I already have an idea for how I
On Saturday, November 30, 2002, at 07:17 PM, Sterling Hughes wrote:
The problem I see with an array approach from an api perspective is
simply when a bucket
is free'd, in order to have efficient memory usage, we'd need a second
level array scan
for every ALLOC_ZVAL().
Perhaps a linked list
The problem I see with an array approach from an api perspective is
simply when a bucket
is free'd, in order to have efficient memory usage, we'd need a second
level array scan
for every ALLOC_ZVAL().
Perhaps a linked list would be a better choice for this, as we can
just be smart about bucket
A little off-list discussion has sold me on the linked list
implementation. Seems very fast and very simple.
George
On Saturday, November 30, 2002, at 07:53 PM, Daniel Cowgill wrote:
On Saturday, November 30, 2002, at 07:17 PM, Sterling Hughes wrote:
The problem I see with an array
On Sat, 30 Nov 2002, George Schlossnagle wrote:
A little off-list discussion has sold me on the linked list
implementation. Seems very fast and very simple.
O(1) operations are hard to beat. Note that free lists are
not primarily about speed, they are also an extremely helpful
At 07:17 PM 11/30/2002 -0500, Sterling Hughes wrote:
hrm. :)
My only question is really about sequential accesses. for the purpose of
example
let's pretend its just for zvals...
(pool is our pool array of zval structs)
ALLOC_ZVAL()
- Do we have a zval available?
- yes!
- return
29 matches
Mail list logo
