If Nathan's suggestion is not just an unreliable side effect, maybe this
should be documented. (ie changed from Feature/Change request)
regards,
Alan.
- Original Message -
From: "Nathan Cassano" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 15,
OK, I was way off base in my reasoning... :-)
Thanks for the clarification Zeev and Zak.
Alan.
How is this? I modified what Zeev said a wee bit:
== is a 'loose' comparison operator [1].
In most cases, this is more convenient - the operator does the right thing
without needing any
