RE: [PHP-DEV] RfC: version names

2003-01-31 Thread James Aylett
Sascha: > $ cd php4; cvs upd > > and a day later > > $ cd php4/ext/standard; cvs upd > > What is the checkout date here? It should be the time of the second update, if anything. Now it /is/ possible to find this out (by getting the most recent modification date of any CVS control file i

RE: [PHP-DEV] RfC: version names

2003-01-31 Thread James Aylett
Derrick wrote: > > date > /CURRENT_TIME > > > > This can be done ... for manual checkouts without > > changing source files in cvs. > > How is that possible? I don't think it is, because it needs to be done at checkout time, not at build time. I previously suggested (with Derrick's reply): > > I

RE: [PHP-DEV] RfC: version names

2003-01-31 Thread James Aylett
> > > I suppose we can have the snapshot generator do that, but it > > > would still hard to differentiate between CVS versions then. > > Sounds a little bit stupid, but why the snapshot generator can't simply > > commit a changed /main/php_version.h every 2 hours? > > That can be done, but that

RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: #21659 [Com]: sprintf

2003-01-15 Thread James Aylett
your continued support of PHP. was not the best mood enhancer when I came in the following morning :-) Cheers, James -- James Aylett Chief Technical Architect, Tangozebra t 020 7535 9850 f 020 7535 9900 w http://tangozebra.com/ This e-mail message, including any attachments, is inten

RE: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] Redirect on Error

2002-11-22 Thread James Aylett
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On > >What is so hard to understand in word 'FATAL'? >If your script doesn't work, what use is it to make it >show the cryptic 500 error?? > >I'm -10 for adding anything like this, even if and >even more then if it's option