Re: [PHP-DEV] Performance degradation part 2 the module version

2003-02-23 Thread Jim Jagielski
Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: > > That's true, but in threaded mode we don't do the chdir() at all. This is > specifically for non-threaded. > Gotcha... didn't realize you were referring to non-t'ed only. -- ========

Re: [PHP-DEV] Performance degradation part 2 the module version

2003-02-23 Thread Jim Jagielski
f threadA does chdir(/tmp) and then threadB does chdir(/var), then the actual process is in /var for the remainder of threadA (IIRC). chdir() is process scoped. -- ======= Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: PHP profiling results under 2.0.37 Re: Performance of Apache

2002-06-08 Thread Jim Jagielski
I say unbuffered, let's call the whole thing off... :) Seriously though, +1 -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order wil

Re: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] add PATH_INFO and PATH_TRANSLATED to apache2 sapi ... RE

2002-05-13 Thread Jim Jagielski
ed unless the >admin knows what they're doing. > Why enable? Portability, since this was the expected and normal behavior with previous rev's. :) -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http:/

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: PHPINIDir directive

2002-04-22 Thread Jim Jagielski
rror message. Plus, this is a pretty special directive as well... :/ -- =========== Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little orde

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: PHPINIDir directive

2002-04-22 Thread Jim Jagielski
Aaron Bannert wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 04:01:25PM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > Right now, we assume that each successive use of PHPINIDir is > > due to its inclusion in a . I wonder if > > that's overly restrictive... Should we allow successive uses an

[PHP-DEV] PHPINIDir directive

2002-04-22 Thread Jim Jagielski
Aaron, Right now, we assume that each successive use of PHPINIDir is due to its inclusion in a . I wonder if that's overly restrictive... Should we allow successive uses and just honor the last one? -- === Jim Jagi

Re: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] rev. 2 of my apache2filters SEGV fixes

2002-04-11 Thread Jim Jagielski
luding one that > will significantly improve output buffering/copying. > -- =========== Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A society that will trade a little liberty for a li

Re: [PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-QA] Supporting Apache 2 with PHP 4.2.0

2002-04-11 Thread Jim Jagielski
. Also, having > PHP available for Apache 2 would be awesome sooner than later. :) > > -aaron > > -- > PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > -- ===

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Bug #15580 Updated: sapi_apache2.c fails to compile with Apache

2002-04-06 Thread Jim Jagielski
nabled > >Configure options: > > --with-mpm=worker \ > > --prefix=/usr/local/ap2 \ > > --enable-module=so > >PHP latest CVS, configure options: > > --with-apxs2=/usr/local/ap2/bin/apxs > >GNU ld version 2.11.92.0.12.3 20011121 Debian/GNU Linux > >gcc 2.95.4 > >ltmain.sh (GN

Re: [PHP-DEV] apache2filter efficiency

2002-04-06 Thread Jim Jagielski
ds to be slurped... think compiled instead of interpreted. -- ======= Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both and deserve neither" - T.J

Re: [PHP-DEV] apache2filter and apache2.0.35-dev, query_string vars missing

2002-04-05 Thread Jim Jagielski
cooked up: > > echo "hi foo=$foo\n"; > echo "$foo\n"; > ?> > > for ($i = 0; $i < 10; $i++) { > echo "line $i\n"; > } > ?> > > > Anyone else working with the apache2filter? > Aaron, let me take a gander ov

Re: [PHP-DEV] Woah

2001-09-08 Thread Jim Jagielski
interface to it to insulate them from the real magic does them, IMO, a disservice. -- ======= Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A society that will trade a little liberty for a l

[PHP-DEV] srandom vs srand48

2001-02-04 Thread Jim Jagielski
Isn't srandom() the prefered implementation over srand48()? But if both are found, PHP chooses srand48(). Any objections to me switching that around? -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|]

Re: [PHP-DEV] xbithack?

2001-02-04 Thread Jim Jagielski
er-side parsed (with SSI). -- =========== Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "Casanova will have many weapons; To beat him you will have to have more than forks and flatulence." -- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php

Re: [PHP-DEV] file.c fsock.c ... Again ...

2001-01-13 Thread Jim Jagielski
It's the wrapper for ZTS not fully wrapping what it should... Derick Rethans wrote: > > Hello, > > can you try the latest CVS? Zeev did some work on it today. > > Derick -- ======= Jim Jagielski

Re: [PHP-DEV] Sent location header with port!

2001-01-11 Thread Jim Jagielski
t; But it won't redirect! Anyway know a solution? Please help! Shall I = > define > > the port antoher place, or is it impossible to send a header = > containing a > > port? > >=20 > > With Best Regards > >=20 > > Johan Holst Nielsen > >=20 > &