line to the top of the files.
-- Medvitz
--
Edit Bug report at: http://bugs.php.net/?id=8958&edit=1
--
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrato
[2001-01-27 18:20:35] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Doing file uploads with php 4.0.4pl1 on RH7 (RedHat RPMs) appends the Content-Type:
/x line to the top of the files.
-- Medvitz
---
Full Bug description
make money off of the hard work of all of
the module contributors, which I think really blows.
I really enjoy using PHP. I think the authors have done a commendible job.
I just wish that it was more open.
Medvitz
Ken Egervari wrote:
> Although your arguments make sense for speed,
I've been looking at some of the files on LXR.php.net when I noticed that
as of Dec, Zend is no longer using the QPL. I apologize for posting not
knowing all of the facts, but the QPL license is included in the 4.1.2
source package, and that is what I was using as a basis.....
Me
fcount property of the zend_op_array is
used for.. please email me.
Medvitz
Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
> Edin Kadribasic wrote:
>> I'm using sysvshm and sysvsem for this sort of things. It did provide
>> dramatic speed difference with a static array of some 130 KB. However
&g
function ( $data = perDataGet($key) )
I hope this makes things more clear. The SEM stuff looks really cool, I
just don't think it fits the needs that I have. We could, however, discuss
further I may be wrong.
Medvitz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, 12 Apr
bill
my card (all of which I replied to asking how to change my card info). I'm
glad you have had good expeirience with them, 'cause I haven't. And the
package that made the mose sense to me, they no longer offer.
Medvitz
Dave Mertens wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 07:
Actually, I'd rather see a w3c DOM compliant module than a makeshift DOM,
which is what DOMXML seems to be. This would make a lot of things a lot
easier, not to mention standard
Medvitz
Lukas Schroeder wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 13, 2002 at 12:41:44PM +0200, Christian Stocker wrote:
>&
Is there a way to wrap existing c++ classes into a PHP class (via an
extension) ?
Medvitz
--
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
This may have been addressed already but:
If I have the following code:
class Beer
{
...
}
$a = new Beer();
define('BaseBeer', $a);
$b = BaseBeer;
Will $a & $b be the same object or will $b be a copy. (Under ZE2).
Thx.
Medvitz
--
PHP Development Mailing List <h
Should it be the same object, though???
I thought that the whole concept of a 'constant' was that it, well, was
constant. Wouldn't it make more sense to auto-clone objects when they are
accessed through a constant
Medvitz
Zeev Suraski wrote:
> It'll be the sam
I'll have to work around it....
Medvitz
Stig S. Bakken wrote:
> Assigning an object to a constant is, IMHO, abuse of constants. What
> would you expect? An immutable object? You would probably be better
> off making a function to clone your object or something like that
This is my thoughts on this I'd appreciate any comments.
I think I could get it done in a few (2-3) weeks. Although I'm a little
unsure of the thread safety issues.
Medvitz
Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
> Thanks for all who gave me feedback.
> This is summary. If you have comme
13 matches
Mail list logo
