ame
instance
> irrespective of the request.
> p
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Alexander Skwar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Purushotham Komaravolu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
&
ot; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 2:53 PM
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] singleton feature
So sprach Purushotham Komaravolu am 2002-06-24 um 11:39:36 -0700 :
>
> Hi ,
> I have a small suggestion. I gue
So sprach Purushotham Komaravolu am 2002-06-24 um 11:39:36 -0700 :
>
> Hi ,
> I have a small suggestion. I guess it is a good feature to
> have a provision to have a Singleton class per webserver instance. This is
> especially useful for maintain user defined connection pools, logge
Purushotham Komaravolu wrote:
> I have a small suggestion. I guess it is a good feature to
> have a provision to have a Singleton class per webserver instance.
You can do this with SRM.
--
Sebastian Bergmann
http://sebastian-bergmann.de/ http://phpOpenTracker.de/
Did I
Hi ,
I have a small suggestion. I guess it is a good feature to
have a provision to have a Singleton class per webserver instance. This is
especially useful for maintain user defined connection pools, loggers etc.
Thanks
Regards,
Puru
