, 21 Sep 2001 18:18:30 +0300
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>From: Andi Gutmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Fwd: [PHP-DEV] Bug id #11998 - source code patch - Dont Use
> Previous (fwd)
>
>Guys,
>
>I think this is the last problem which is holding up RC3 and hopefully 4.0.7
>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 8:14 PM
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Bug id #11998 - source code patch - Dont Use Previous
(fwd)
> On Fri, 21 Sep 2001, Andi Gutmans wrote:
>
> > Seems like boyer_str_to_str() is buggy. If I change it to
php_str_to_str()
> > it see
" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 6:18 PM
> >Subject: Fwd: [PHP-DEV] Bug id #11998 - source code patch - Dont Use
> >Previous (fwd)
> >
> >
> > > Guys,
> > >
> > >
no one answers I'll apply it and we should as the QA guys to test
file
> > > uploads extensively in RC3.
> > >
> > > Andi
> > >
> > > >Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 17:22:41 +0200 (CEST)
> > > >From: Jani Taskinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Fri, 21 Sep 2001, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> Seems like boyer_str_to_str() is buggy. If I change it to php_str_to_str()
> it seems to work.
> I think Sascha added this function but I might be wrong.
I did not change nl2br though. I probably would have noticed
that, if the commit message w
but if i am not wrong, it is a serious thing...
>
>in short hangs with
>latest cvs.
>
>b.
>
>- Original Message -
>From: "Andi Gutmans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 6:18 PM
>Subject
, September 21, 2001 6:18 PM
Subject: Fwd: [PHP-DEV] Bug id #11998 - source code patch - Dont Use
Previous (fwd)
> Guys,
>
> I think this is the last problem which is holding up RC3 and hopefully
4.0.7.
>
> Does anyone here know the code in rfc1867? I don't know it well enoug
e
uploads extensively in RC3.
Andi
>Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 17:22:41 +0200 (CEST)
>From: Jani Taskinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sender: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: [PHP-DEV] Bug id #11998 - source code patch - Dont Use Previous (fwd)
>
>
>Co
>
> Yes, it should be in RC3. And no, I don't know why there were
> too packages. Ralf, can you explain? :)
>
> --Jani
Ehmm, sorry, with my second mail i sent the fixed fix and the corrupt fix.
This was due to the use of this webmailer here. I did not notice that it
attached the wrong version a
Is this something which should make it into RC3?
Why are there two .tar.gz files attached?
Andi
At 05:22 PM 9/18/2001 +0200, Jani Taskinen wrote:
>Could someone who knows the current code better
>check this out and apply this patch?
>
>My work for the other issues is not done yet..and it's too
>
10 matches
Mail list logo