Re: [PHP-DEV] FW: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4 /ext/midgard .cvsignore ChangeLog INSTALL Makefile.in access.c article.c attachment.c calendar.c config.m4 element.c event.c eventmember.c file.c fudge genentry.pl

If this is an extension, though, then it can still be independent of PHP? The major step they made is the ability to interface with PHP without having to patch it. IMHO, Midgard should *probably* not be inside the PHP source tree / tarball, but it'd be nice if it's well linked from php.net (

Re: [PHP-DEV] FW: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4 /ext/midgard .cvsignore ChangeLog INSTALL Makefile.in access.c article.c attachment.c calendar.c config.m4 element.c event.c eventmember.c file.c fudge genentry.pl group.c ho

I also tend to think it's kind of strange. It's about 800KB of source code and as far as I understand this is an extension module which will be used by almost no one (and everyone will be forced to dl an extra 800KB (300KB compressed)). Any of the Midgard people on this list? Is there any good

[PHP-DEV] FW: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4 /ext/midgard .cvsignore ChangeLog INSTALL Makefile.in access.c article.c attachment.c calendar.c config.m4 element.c event.c eventmember.c file.c fudge genentry.pl group.c ho

Thought this should really be brought up on Dev list rather than CVS list but personally I dont think that midgard has a place in the main distributions CVS.. maybe im wrong but if we begin to put all full applications in CVS just because they are useful we are going to bloat. Whats the difference