On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> http://www.faqts.com/knowledge_base/view.phtml/aid/734/fid/37
> It sounds to me that you are right. That should probably just be request_uri.
> I thought many people have used this $PHP_SELF so it's kind of strange that
> there haven't been a zillion com
http://www.faqts.com/knowledge_base/view.phtml/aid/734/fid/37
It sounds to me that you are right. That should probably just be request_uri.
I thought many people have used this $PHP_SELF so it's kind of strange that
there haven't been a zillion complaints.
Does anyone object to changing this beha
>Can you give an example of how it looks with request_uri and how it looks
>with both? Then it'll be easier for someone like me who doesn't know the
>standard too well to check the PHP manual and the HTTP standard to see
>what
>the correct behavior should be.
>
Well, I can't really test this, as
Can you give an example of how it looks with request_uri and how it looks
with both? Then it'll be easier for someone like me who doesn't know the
standard too well to check the PHP manual and the HTTP standard to see what
the correct behavior should be.
Andi
At 07:55 AM 4/29/2001 -0400, Ster
I've taken a look at the code that registers $PHP_SELF in the CGI version,
in accordance with bug 6491. I see the problem, its that on some server &
OS combinations, the SCRIPT_NAME environment variable is incorrectly set
and therefore the below code exhibits the bug (the strcmp() should
avoid t
