On Wed, 6 Nov 2002 14:11:03 +0100
Kjartan Mannes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Doesn't this make things overly complex? Any good reason why the
> missing values in variables_order don't just get automatically
> appended to the end?
It is just faster to check if the var exists and returns it inste
Wednesday, November 6, 2002, 1:54:21 PM, Pierre-Alain Joye wrote:
> As far as I remember, this a knonw problem due to the variables order or
> something like that. We ve got it in PEAR a few weeks ago, solved by
> using a simple:
> $foo = isset($_ENV['foo'])?$_ENV['foo']:getenv('foo');
> See php
Wednesday, November 6, 2002, 1:46:25 PM, Marcus Boerger wrote:
> Does ini setting variables_order include E?
Does now and it works as expected. Thanks.
> At 13:30 06.11.2002, Kjartan Mannes wrote:
>>I just tried using php-cli from the latest cvs and am a little confused
>>by the placement of shel
On Wed, 6 Nov 2002 13:30:03 +0100
Kjartan Mannes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just tried using php-cli from the latest cvs and am a little
> confused by the placement of shell environment variables. $_ENV is
> empty, but the values are stored in $HTTP_SERVER_VARS and $_SERVER.
>
> Is this the p
Does ini setting variables_order include E?
At 13:30 06.11.2002, Kjartan Mannes wrote:
I just tried using php-cli from the latest cvs and am a little confused
by the placement of shell environment variables. $_ENV is empty, but the
values are stored in $HTTP_SERVER_VARS and $_SERVER.
Is this the
I just tried using php-cli from the latest cvs and am a little confused
by the placement of shell environment variables. $_ENV is empty, but the
values are stored in $HTTP_SERVER_VARS and $_SERVER.
Is this the proper behavior?
--
Kjartan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (http://natrak.net/)
:: "Women are mad
