[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Mar 2002, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
>
>
>>According to Derick's post, VC defines NDEBUG somewhere else.
>>Following patch should fix "redfined" warnings.
>
>
> This doesn't seem like a good idea, VC++ might be using NDEBUG for very
> different reasons. How did
On Fri, 15 Mar 2002, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
> According to Derick's post, VC defines NDEBUG somewhere else.
> Following patch should fix "redfined" warnings.
This doesn't seem like a good idea, VC++ might be using NDEBUG for very
different reasons. How did you come up with the name NDEBUG?
> Anyo
