On 4 Dec 2002, Stig S. Bakken wrote:
> On Fri, 2002-11-29 at 18:20, Philip Olson wrote:
> > > On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, Wez Furlong wrote:
> > > IMO, the manual should include all of the "maintstream" PHP extensions.
> > > The reasoning is that if someone downloads the PHP manual, they expect
> > > to
> We talkes about this at our March Doc meeting. The problem is that the
> different doc systems mostly started out from the initial "phpdoc"
> repositories system, and developed on their own ways. Reuniting the build
> systems under one umbrella would be quite a hard task, and I don't know who
> c
Well, you raise some points ;)
> Again, IMO, the madness of having no less than 3 different docu systems
> (phpdoc, peardoc and peardoc2) makes very little sense; why not just use
> "one system (tm)" for docs? (let's save some developer brain power for
> more useful things).
We talkes about this
