Ok, we need to make sure we're not creating a bigger problem with that fix.
Zeev
At 10:44 25/09/2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, Zeev Suraski wrote:
>
> > Just to clear any doubts - was there any real-world problem with the way
> > things were working before this change?
>
>Y
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, Zeev Suraski wrote:
> Just to clear any doubts - was there any real-world problem with the way
> things were working before this change?
Yes, there was a problem. I remember 'fixing' that, and there is also a
bugreport about it which I can not find right now.
Derick
x=>
> This is probably the best solution to the problem. We just have to
> remember to explain the issue in the release notes when 4.3.0 gets
> released. Perhaps also make the old format default on Windows since
> probably most people use php-cgi with IIS.
Well, I am not so certain about that --
Just to clear any doubts - was there any real-world problem with the way
things were working before this change?
Zeev
At 10:26 25/09/2002, Edin Kadribasic wrote:
>On Wed, 25 Sep 2002 08:36:42 +0200 (CEST), Sascha Schumann wrote:
> > On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, Edin Kadribasic wrote:
> >
> > > For some
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002 08:36:42 +0200 (CEST), Sascha Schumann wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, Edin Kadribasic wrote:
>
> > For some reason http status reporting has been changed in the
> > current CVS version of PHP. This breaks PHP under IIS and possibly
> > other servers. Please see http://bugs.php.
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, Edin Kadribasic wrote:
> For some reason http status reporting has been changed in the current CVS
> version of PHP. This breaks PHP under IIS and possibly other servers. Please
> see http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=19207 for details.
The reason is that it did not work pr
