At 19:07 4-2-2003, Sascha Schumann wrote:
On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, Melvyn Sopacua wrote:
> At 17:29 4-2-2003, you wrote:
>
> >btw. It seems like that test I added for the broken
> > sed is not working on some systems. Any ideas why?
>
> That's the grep -E part :)
> Just use `egrep' unless any
On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, Melvyn Sopacua wrote:
> At 17:29 4-2-2003, you wrote:
>
> >btw. It seems like that test I added for the broken
> > sed is not working on some systems. Any ideas why?
>
> That's the grep -E part :)
> Just use `egrep' unless any1 knows of a system that doesn't carry egrep
Jani Taskinen wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, J Smith wrote:
>
> /usr/xpg4/bin/sed
>
> It should be part of standard install too..
>
> --Jani
I hate Solaris. There's four seds on my system now: /usr/local/bin/sed,
/usr/bin/sed, /usr/ucb/sed and /bin/sed.
Yeah, xpg4 sed seems to w
On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, Melvyn Sopacua wrote:
>At 17:29 4-2-2003, you wrote:
>
>>btw. It seems like that test I added for the broken
>> sed is not working on some systems. Any ideas why?
>
>That's the grep -E part :)
>Just use `egrep' unless any1 knows of a system that doesn't carry egrep?.
At 17:29 4-2-2003, you wrote:
btw. It seems like that test I added for the broken
sed is not working on some systems. Any ideas why?
That's the grep -E part :)
Just use `egrep' unless any1 knows of a system that doesn't carry egrep?.
With kind regards,
Melvyn Sopacua
--
PHP Develo
On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, J Smith wrote:
>Jani Taskinen wrote:
>
>>
>> There should be another version of 'sed' in Solaris which can handle
>> the long lines though. No idea why they have 2 versions.
>
>Never knew that. Is that part of a standard install, or is it bundled in
>some kind of patch
Jani Taskinen wrote:
>
> There should be another version of 'sed' in Solaris which can handle
> the long lines though. No idea why they have 2 versions.
>
> --Jani
Never knew that. Is that part of a standard install, or is it bundled in
some kind of patch, or does it have a diff
On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, Sascha Schumann wrote:
>> There should be another version of 'sed' in Solaris which can handle
>> the long lines though. No idea why they have 2 versions.
>
>IIRC that is due to Solaris' BSD heritage. Solaris 1 (SunOS 4)
>was based on BSD (from the University o
> There should be another version of 'sed' in Solaris which can handle
> the long lines though. No idea why they have 2 versions.
IIRC that is due to Solaris' BSD heritage. Solaris 1 (SunOS 4)
was based on BSD (from the University of California,
Berkeley, hence ucb) and they h
On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, J Smith wrote:
>Zeev Suraski wrote:
>
>> I don't think we can rely on GNU grep being installed though...
>>
>
>Well, we pretty much need to rely on GNU sed being installed on Solaris, so
>why not grep, too? The sed problem comes up when doing the final linking
>when building.
Zeev Suraski wrote:
> I don't think we can rely on GNU grep being installed though...
>
Well, we pretty much need to rely on GNU sed being installed on Solaris, so
why not grep, too? The sed problem comes up when doing the final linking
when building. You usually end up with a collosal libtool l
I don't think we can rely on GNU grep being installed though...
At 17:29 04/02/2003, J Smith wrote:
GNU grep should work. Just make sure /usr/local/bin comes before /bin in
your $PATH.
J
Sebastian Nohn wrote:
> Latest CVS (PHP5-dev) on Solaris:
>
> Configuring TSRM
> checking for stdarg.h...
GNU grep should work. Just make sure /usr/local/bin comes before /bin in
your $PATH.
J
Sebastian Nohn wrote:
> Latest CVS (PHP5-dev) on Solaris:
>
> Configuring TSRM
> checking for stdarg.h... (cached) yes
> grep: illegal option -- E
> Usage: grep -hblcnsviw pattern file . . .
>
> Regards, S
13 matches
Mail list logo
