Hello,
Andi Gutmans wrote:
> If you're going to continue with this sour attitude towards the PHP
> developers who are putting a huge effort into improving PHP then I suggest
> you unsubscribe from php-dev. I have no problem with constructive
> criticism and I'm sure mistakes have been made in the
On Mon, 14 Jan 2002, Manuel Lemos wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Robert Mena wrote:
> >
> > Hi Manuel and all developers.
> >
> > I understand that the implementation of strtok was
> > "broken" (non POSIX compliant) but since it has been
> > like this for ages would be better to give a chance to
> > deve
Hello,
Robert Mena wrote:
>
> Hi Manuel and all developers.
>
> I understand that the implementation of strtok was
> "broken" (non POSIX compliant) but since it has been
> like this for ages would be better to give a chance to
> developers worldwide (that has been using and relied
> on this bro
> Don't you have a requirement in the PHP CODING STANDARDS file that makes
> it mandatory for PHP developers to note down important changes? Not
> having such requirement just allows messy development habits to
> jeopardize PHP code quality.
Yes, and the commit that changed the behaviour did have
Hello,
Mark Charette wrote:
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Manuel Lemos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Before somebody decides to repress my opinion again,
>
> Hah! That's got to be one of the funniest things I've ever read!
>
> Downloads do not imply usage, only curiosity. I've do
BC was broken, this happens sometimes. The majority of the PHP Dev team
agrees that strtok() should be POSIX compliant, so it is now, and forever
will be.
Not being in NEWS/Changelog was an oversight/error, nobody is perfect.
This not happening in the future is a desire of everyone. Also, it'll
> -Original Message-
> From: Manuel Lemos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Before somebody decides to repress my opinion again,
Hah! That's got to be one of the funniest things I've ever read!
Downloads do not imply usage, only curiosity. I've downloaded a large number
of PHP class libraries
ction in the page below. It also contains a fixed version of
> > dirname that was also broke between PHP 4 and 4.1.0.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Manuel Lemos
> >
> >
> > > A+
> > > Alain
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > >
Alain
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Manuel Lemos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 2:44 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Robert Mena
> > Subject: [PHP-DEV] Re: strtok bug
> >
> > Hello,
> >
&g
s,
Manuel Lemos
> A+
> Alain
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Manuel Lemos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 2:44 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Robert Mena
> Subject: [PHP-DEV] Re: strtok bug
>
> Hello,
>
> Rob
ECTED]; Robert Mena
Subject: [PHP-DEV] Re: strtok bug
Hello,
Robert Mena wrote:
>
> Hi, does anybody know when the strtok bug introduced
After 4.0.6 .
> in 4.1.1 will be fixed ?
> Will we have a 4.1.2 or should I try to grab a cvs
> tree (assuming that it is already solved) ?
Hello,
Robert Mena wrote:
>
> Hi, does anybody know when the strtok bug introduced
After 4.0.6 .
> in 4.1.1 will be fixed ?
> Will we have a 4.1.2 or should I try to grab a cvs
> tree (assuming that it is already solved) ?
You may want to ask that in php-dev mailing list because last time tha
12 matches
Mail list logo
