e:
>> because it's broken?
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Stig S. Bakken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 4:45 PM
>> To: Jani Taskinen
>> Cc: Derick Rethans; PHP Quality Assurance TeamMailing List; PHP
>>
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 12:03:51PM +0200, Derick Rethans wrote:
> after a little discussion on IRC, we came to the conclusion that it is not
> a good idea to say that php 4.2.0 supports apache 2. The reasoning behind
> is that we are not even 50% sure if apache 2(.0.35) works correctly, or
> th
> TeamMailing List; PHP Developers Mailing List
> Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] Supporting Apache 2 with PHP 4.2.0
>
>
> The point here is that "delta stability" >= 0. It didn't work before,
> it's not worse now. The worst thing that could happen is
> that w
> Developers Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Supporting Apache 2 with PHP 4.2.0
>
>
> We include apache2 support in a bunch of releases while Apache 2 is in
> alpha, but when it's GA-released, we drop the support? What's the sense
> in that? :-)
>
> - S
because it's broken?
-Original Message-
From: Stig S. Bakken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 4:45 PM
To: Jani Taskinen
Cc: Derick Rethans; PHP Quality Assurance TeamMailing List; PHP
Developers Mailing List
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Supporting Apache 2 wit
We include apache2 support in a bunch of releases while Apache 2 is in
alpha, but when it's GA-released, we drop the support? What's the sense
in that? :-)
- Stig
On Tue, 2002-04-09 at 12:12, Jani Taskinen wrote:
>
> +1 for dropping it from 4.2.0
>
> --Jani
>
>
> On Tue, 9
> How can there be if we remove apache2 completely ? :)
They'll probably enter bug reports saying that --with-apxs does not work
with apache 2.0.35. I think it's better to release unstable code provided
that it is marked so, than to release nothing at all.
Edin
--
PHP Development Mailing
+1 for dropping it from 4.2.0
--Jani
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Derick Rethans wrote:
>Hello,
>
>after a little discussion on IRC, we came to the conclusion that it is not
>a good idea to say that php 4.2.0 supports apache 2. The reasoning behind
>is that we are not even 50% sure i
Hello,
after a little discussion on IRC, we came to the conclusion that it is not
a good idea to say that php 4.2.0 supports apache 2. The reasoning behind
is that we are not even 50% sure if apache 2(.0.35) works correctly, or
that the filter works correctly. This is because no single QA was
