And here is a version which flattens the calling args onto a single line
(similar to sebastians usersapce script). Longer, but a bit prettier
output.
Index: Zend/zend.c
===
RCS file: /repository/Zend/zend.c,v
retrieving revision
Here's first shot at a patch. The output it generates is ugly as sin if
you use objects though. I though about flattening them out, but that
gets long and nasty (and requires specialized print functions which
while easy seem to be of marginal use elsewhere.)
George
Index: Zend/zend_builtin_
George Schlossnagle wrote:
> Is there a concensus on how arguments should be printed out?
I quite like the output of
foreach ($backtrace as $step) {
if (!empty($step['args'])) {
foreach ($step['args'] as $arg) {
$args = isset($args) ? $args . ', ' : '';
At 03:18 PM 11/27/2002 -0500, George Schlossnagle wrote:
Ok... but that looks nasty when you are passed an array or an object.
Yeah but backtraces tend to look nasty :)
Andi
Andi Gutmans wrote:
At 03:13 PM 11/27/2002 -0500, George Schlossnagle wrote:
Hmmm any hints on how to get th
Ok... but that looks nasty when you are passed an array or an object.
Andi Gutmans wrote:
At 03:13 PM 11/27/2002 -0500, George Schlossnagle wrote:
Hmmm any hints on how to get the variable name out of the stack?
The code in debug_backtrace seems to only extract the value.
There's no
At 03:13 PM 11/27/2002 -0500, George Schlossnagle wrote:
Hmmm any hints on how to get the variable name out of the stack? The
code in debug_backtrace seems to only extract the value.
There's no way but I don't think it's needed. When I wrote $arg1 I meant
the value not the name of the vari
Hmmm any hints on how to get the variable name out of the stack?
The code in debug_backtrace seems to only extract the value.
George
Andi Gutmans wrote:
I'd probably go for class::function($arg1, $arg2).
Also take into consideration that the args aren't always available.
Andi
At 02:58 PM
> Is there a concensus on how arguments should be printed out?
> I'm shooting right now for a 'cluck' style backtrave
> class::function() called at file:line
>
> Perhaps
>
> class::function() called at file:line
>Arguments:
>print_r(args)
>
> ??
Well, probably the following:
class::funct
I'd probably go for class::function($arg1, $arg2).
Also take into consideration that the args aren't always available.
Andi
At 02:58 PM 11/27/2002 -0500, George Schlossnagle wrote:
Is there a concensus on how arguments should be printed out?
I'm shooting right now for a 'cluck' style backtrave
Is there a concensus on how arguments should be printed out?
I'm shooting right now for a 'cluck' style backtrave
class::function() called at file:line
Perhaps
class::function() called at file:line
Arguments:
print_r(args)
??
Andi Gutmans wrote:
That'd be cool.
At 01:32 PM 11/27/20
Andi Gutmans wrote:
> At 03:41 PM 11/27/2002 +0100, Derick Rethans wrote:
> >On Wed, 27 Nov 2002, Miham KEREKES wrote:
> >
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > I'm new to this list, I want to know if there is any function which
> > > could return the actual call stack, or is it planned to be added?
> > > It coul
That'd be cool.
At 01:32 PM 11/27/2002 -0500, George Schlossnagle wrote:
I'll do it, if you want.
Andi Gutmans wrote:
At 07:23 PM 11/27/2002 +0100, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Wed, 27 Nov 2002, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> At 03:41 PM 11/27/2002 +0100, Derick Rethans wrote:
> >On Wed, 27 Nov 2002, Mi
I'll do it, if you want.
Andi Gutmans wrote:
At 07:23 PM 11/27/2002 +0100, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Wed, 27 Nov 2002, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> At 03:41 PM 11/27/2002 +0100, Derick Rethans wrote:
> >On Wed, 27 Nov 2002, Miham KEREKES wrote:
> >
> >debug_backtrace() will be available in PHP 4.3.0
At 07:23 PM 11/27/2002 +0100, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Wed, 27 Nov 2002, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> At 03:41 PM 11/27/2002 +0100, Derick Rethans wrote:
> >On Wed, 27 Nov 2002, Miham KEREKES wrote:
> >
> >debug_backtrace() will be available in PHP 4.3.0 and higher.
>
> if someone has time to implement
On Wed, 27 Nov 2002, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> At 03:41 PM 11/27/2002 +0100, Derick Rethans wrote:
> >On Wed, 27 Nov 2002, Miham KEREKES wrote:
> >
> >debug_backtrace() will be available in PHP 4.3.0 and higher.
>
> if someone has time to implement debug_print_backtrace() that would be
> cool. Using
At 03:41 PM 11/27/2002 +0100, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Wed, 27 Nov 2002, Miham KEREKES wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm new to this list, I want to know if there is any function which
> could return the actual call stack, or is it planned to be added?
> It could be very useful (for example in my case, now :-
> On Wed, 27 Nov 2002 15:41:25 +0100 (CET)
> Derick Rethans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 27 Nov 2002, Miham KEREKES wrote:
> >
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > I'm new to this list, I want to know if there is any function which
> > > could return the actual call stack, or is it planned to be ad
debug_backtrace was backported into ze1. 4.3 will sstill use ze1.
George
Phil Dier wrote:
On Wed, 27 Nov 2002 15:41:25 +0100 (CET)
Derick Rethans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 27 Nov 2002, Miham KEREKES wrote:
Hi!
I'm new to this list, I want to know if there is any function which
co
On Wed, 27 Nov 2002 15:41:25 +0100 (CET)
Derick Rethans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Nov 2002, Miham KEREKES wrote:
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > I'm new to this list, I want to know if there is any function which
> > could return the actual call stack, or is it planned to be added?
> > It could
On Wed, 27 Nov 2002, Miham KEREKES wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm new to this list, I want to know if there is any function which
> could return the actual call stack, or is it planned to be added?
> It could be very useful (for example in my case, now :-).
debug_backtrace() will be available in PHP 4.3.0
Hi!
I'm new to this list, I want to know if there is any function which
could return the actual call stack, or is it planned to be added?
It could be very useful (for example in my case, now :-).
If it's already implemented, i'm sorry, i could not be able to find it
in the doc.. In this case RTFM
21 matches
Mail list logo
