On Tue Oct 01, 2002 at 09:2106PM +0200, Edin Kadribasic wrote:
> "make install" part of php install needs to be fixed in the PEAR part. This
> currently does not work, at least for me on Linux.
We are working on this.
--
- Martin Martin Jansen
On Tuesday 01 October 2002 19:37, Andrei Zmievski wrote:
> On Tue, 01 Oct 2002, Lukas Smith wrote:
> > But I think PEAR needs to get its community and development structure
> > setup correclty before 4.3 with an offical PEAR should hit the streets.
[snip]
>
> I don't think that PHP 4.3.0 and PEAR
Lukas Smith wrote:
> The point is that PEAR needs to be ready on all levels (technical and
> community) before it should go public. If PEAR will go public with php
> 4.3 then it needs to be complete in that respect. The damage to PEAR if
> this is not the case will be great and will take a long t
> From: Andrei Zmievski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 7:38 PM
>
> On Tue, 01 Oct 2002, Lukas Smith wrote:
> > But I think PEAR needs to get its community and development
structure
> > setup correclty before 4.3 with an offical PEAR should hit the
streets.
> >
> > [s
Andrei Zmievski wrote:
> I don't think that PHP 4.3.0 and PEAR have such a big interdependency.
> 4.3.0 can go out without having all the minute details of PEAR
> management decided.
+1, only the installer stuff + package browser should really be stable
and usable with php4.3
--
PHP Developm
On Tue, 01 Oct 2002, Lukas Smith wrote:
> But I think PEAR needs to get its community and development structure
> setup correclty before 4.3 with an offical PEAR should hit the streets.
>
> [snipped]
>
> I think that the PHP Conference in Frankfurt would fit perfectly to
> setup a round table (m
> From: Martin Jansen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 7:02 PM
>
> Most of the stuff is explained in the PEAR developers guide:
> http://pear.php.net/manual/en/guide-developers.php
>
that does look fairly comprehensive. I know it wasnt there when i
started with PEA
On Tue, 1 Oct 2002 19:05:22 +0200
Martin Jansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue Oct 01, 2002 at 07:0226PM +0200, Martin Jansen wrote:
> > I think PEAR is pretty fare and it is absolutely read for a first
> > appearance on the official stage.
>
> Doh, ignore this. Better: I think PEAR is abso
On Tue Oct 01, 2002 at 07:0226PM +0200, Martin Jansen wrote:
> I think PEAR is pretty fare and it is absolutely read for a first
> appearance on the official stage.
Doh, ignore this. Better: I think PEAR is absolutely ready for a first
appearance on the official stage.
--
- Martin
On Tue Oct 01, 2002 at 06:3320PM +0200, Lukas Smith wrote:
> Mainly there are still too many questions marks regarding stuff like:
> - How are packages maintained (especially when the leading developer is
> gone ... PEAR DB currently seems to be an example of this with bugs
> hanging in the air an
10 matches
Mail list logo
