Re: [PHP-DEV] DOM-XML memory leak?

On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 12:07:25AM +0200, Christian Stocker wrote : > On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, Markus Fischer wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 04:42:38PM -0400, Al Baker wrote : > > > I want to use the dom-xml extension in a production environment, is the > > > dom-xml memory leak significant, ie wi

Re: [PHP-DEV] DOM-XML memory leak?

On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, Markus Fischer wrote: > On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 04:42:38PM -0400, Al Baker wrote : > > I want to use the dom-xml extension in a production environment, is the > > dom-xml memory leak significant, ie will the whole machine run out of > > available memory or ? > > You mean t

Re: [PHP-DEV] DOM-XML memory leak?

On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 04:42:38PM -0400, Al Baker wrote : > I want to use the dom-xml extension in a production environment, is the > dom-xml memory leak significant, ie will the whole machine run out of > available memory or ? You mean this built in feature that domxml leaks a few bytes

Re: [PHP-DEV] DOM XML uses non-DOM compliant calls

--- Christian Stocker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi > > > Yeah thats pretty much it. It does make it eaiser for people using > > dom in another lanugage to pick it up in php if it did conform to > > the standard. Expecially how we are trying to conform the functions > > to begin with. Instead o

Re: [PHP-DEV] DOM XML uses non-DOM compliant calls

Hi > Yeah thats pretty much it. It does make it eaiser for people using > dom in another lanugage to pick it up in php if it did conform to > the standard. Expecially how we are trying to conform the functions > to begin with. Instead of having append_child... why not add_child.. 'cause appendCh

Re: [PHP-DEV] DOM XML uses non-DOM compliant calls

Yeah thats pretty much it. It does make it eaiser for people using dom in another lanugage to pick it up in php if it did conform to the standard. Expecially how we are trying to conform the functions to begin with. Instead of having append_child... why not add_child.. - We started conforming to

Re: [PHP-DEV] DOM XML uses non-DOM compliant calls

--- Markus Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > btw, not my personal opinion :) I just wanted to let you know > this was discussed so you can search the archives for it. Understood ;) > Btw, first you said 'w3c convention' now it's a standard? > anyway Again, I'm no

Re: [PHP-DEV] DOM XML uses non-DOM compliant calls

Hi, I fail to see the advante. Is it only that 'it looks like what the w3c recommends' and 'so users already used to the api have it easier' or did I miss something else? - Markus On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 01:47:22PM -0700, Brent R. Matzelle wrote : > --- brad lafountain <[EM

Re: [PHP-DEV] DOM XML uses non-DOM compliant calls

--- brad lafountain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Why don't we just add alias... so it will be BC and > so we don't get shunned on by people like that. That would fit the bill nicely. Brent __ Do You Yahoo!? LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience h

Re: [PHP-DEV] DOM XML uses non-DOM compliant calls

Why don't we just add alias... so it will be BC and so we don't get shunned on by people like that. - Brad --- Markus Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > btw, not my personal opinion :) I just wanted to let you know > this was discussed so you can search the archives for i

Re: [PHP-DEV] DOM XML uses non-DOM compliant calls

Hi, btw, not my personal opinion :) I just wanted to let you know this was discussed so you can search the archives for it. Btw, first you said 'w3c convention' now it's a standard? anyway - Markus On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 01:27:40PM -0700, Brent R. Matzelle wrote : > -

Re: [PHP-DEV] DOM XML uses non-DOM compliant calls

On Tue, 14 May 2002, Brent R. Matzelle wrote: > --- Markus Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > not giong to happen. It's a PHP convention to use underscores > > to separate words (this was discussed ~ half a year ago > > afaik). > > I realize that this is a PHP convention, but I d

Re: [PHP-DEV] DOM XML uses non-DOM compliant calls

--- Markus Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > not giong to happen. It's a PHP convention to use underscores > to separate words (this was discussed ~ half a year ago > afaik). I realize that this is a PHP convention, but I do not think that it is up to PHP developers to change publi

Re: [PHP-DEV] DOM XML uses non-DOM compliant calls

Hi, not giong to happen. It's a PHP convention to use underscores to separate words (this was discussed ~ half a year ago afaik). - Markus On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 12:49:50PM -0700, Brent R. Matzelle wrote : > I could not help but notice that all DOM XML calls use an > under

Re: [PHP-DEV] DOM XML uses non-DOM compliant calls

Hello, can you file a change/feature request for this @ bugs.php.net ? Derick On Tue, 14 May 2002, Brent R. Matzelle wrote: > I could not help but notice that all DOM XML calls use an > underscore-based convention: > > i.e. > $mynode->append_child($achild); > > I am no language lawyer but i

Re: [PHP-DEV] DOM XML: xmlReplaceNode()

Hi, On Fri, 11 Jan 2002 00:57:52 +0100 "Jaroslaw Kolakowski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What do you think about adding a function domxml_node_replace_node(), that would be a wrapper for xmlReplaceNode() function from libxml? > > As far as I am concerned, there is no easy way to replace a node

Re: [PHP-DEV] DOM XML crash with php 4.1.0

Hello, you can safely ignore this... bad build so it seems. Derick On Thu, 29 Nov 2001, Derick Rethans wrote: > Starting PHP (4.1.0 from www.php.net/~zeev/php-4.1.0.tar.gz) crashed with > the following backtrace: > > 0x08104876 in zend_register_functions (functions=0x4, > function_table=0x

Re: [PHP-DEV] DOM XML Bugs

On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 08:36:54PM +0100, Derick Rethans wrote : > Hello, > > On Wed, 28 Nov 2001, £ukasz Kalita wrote: > > > Could someone tell me WHEN DOM XML will be > > cleared out of those annoying memory leak bugs that > > make this great tool generally unsuable on any production > > serv

Re: [PHP-DEV] DOM XML Bugs

Hello, On Wed, 28 Nov 2001, £ukasz Kalita wrote: > Could someone tell me WHEN DOM XML will be > cleared out of those annoying memory leak bugs that > make this great tool generally unsuable on any production > server? When sombody has enough free time to do that, or when somebody else pays a de

Re: [PHP-DEV] DOM XML enhancement proposal

> I am using php 4.0.6 distribution. I need to use libxslt library, so I've > written a patch for DOM XML extension. Besides I've added some functions More info at http://rainbow.mimuw.edu.pl/~jkolakow/domxml/ Regards, Jarek -- PHP Development Mailing List To unsubscr

Re: [PHP-DEV] Dom XML

I would like to roll it back to 4.0.6 until the current version gets fixed. However, I have not used either of them so that's why I'm waiting for enough feedback from people who actually use it. Andi At 03:12 PM 6/28/2001 +0200, Derick Rethans wrote: >Hello, > >as I about to write PHP scripts w

Re: [PHP-DEV] Dom XML

On Fri, 29 Jun 2001, Andi Gutmans wrote: > I would like to roll it back to 4.0.6 until the current version gets fixed. > However, I have not used either of them so that's why I'm waiting for > enough feedback from people who actually use it. I'd rather see that the current version got fixed, and

Re: [PHP-DEV] Dom XML

On Fri, 29 Jun 2001, Andi Gutmans wrote: > Well everyone would like to see it fixed but no one is fixing it. So we are > better of rolling back. It means we will end up with one version and not > three because we will roll back to 4.0.6. I still count three of those: pre 4.0.5, 4.0.6 and the new

Re: [PHP-DEV] Dom XML

At 01:14 PM 6/29/2001 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >On Fri, 29 Jun 2001, Andi Gutmans wrote: > > > Well everyone would like to see it fixed but no one is fixing it. So we are > > better of rolling back. It means we will end up with one version and not > > three because we will roll back to 4.0.

Re: [PHP-DEV] Dom XML

At 12:38 PM 6/29/2001 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >On Fri, 29 Jun 2001, Andi Gutmans wrote: > > > I would like to roll it back to 4.0.6 until the current version gets fixed. > > However, I have not used either of them so that's why I'm waiting for > > enough feedback from people who actually u

Re: [PHP-DEV] DOM/XML in 4.0.7

At 02:30 PM 6/27/2001 -0400, Colin Viebrock wrote: > > For 4.0.6 I rolled back the DOM/XML changes. It seems as if the current > > "upgrade" isn't being fixed. Maybe we should revert it back to what it was > > in 4.0.6 until it gets a thorough make over? > >You love to make me work, huh? :) > >Se

Re: [PHP-DEV] DOM/XML in 4.0.7

> For 4.0.6 I rolled back the DOM/XML changes. It seems as if the current > "upgrade" isn't being fixed. Maybe we should revert it back to what it was > in 4.0.6 until it gets a thorough make over? You love to make me work, huh? :) Seriously, if we stick with the 4.0.6 version, that's fine. Ho

Re: [PHP-DEV] DOM/XML in 4.0.7

At 09:00 AM 6/27/2001 +0200, Christian Stocker wrote: >In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Andi >Gutmans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hey, > > > > For 4.0.6 I rolled back the DOM/XML changes. It seems as if the current > > "upgrade" isn't being fixed. Maybe we should revert it back to what it >

Re: [PHP-DEV] DOM/XML in 4.0.7

On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Andi Gutmans wrote: > Hey, > > For 4.0.6 I rolled back the DOM/XML changes. It seems as if the current > "upgrade" isn't being fixed. Maybe we should revert it back to what it was > in 4.0.6 until it gets a thorough make over? Might not be a bad idea. The upgrade Ulf put i

Re: [PHP-DEV] DOM/XML in 4.0.7

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Andi Gutmans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey, > > For 4.0.6 I rolled back the DOM/XML changes. It seems as if the current > "upgrade" isn't being fixed. Maybe we should revert it back to what it > was in 4.0.6 until it gets a thorough make over? yes, please :