with me :)
I guess Jim already clarified about these in the manual.
--
Yasuo Ohgaki
>
>
>>-Original Message-
>>From: Yasuo Ohgaki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>Sent: Monday, February 11, 2002 9:26 PM
>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Cc:
ent: Monday, February 11, 2002 9:26 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: 'Chris Newbill'
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] FWD: possible bug in date() function
>
>
> Sean R. Bright wrote:
> > What? The original format string was:
> >
> > &qu
t;
>
>>-Original Message-
>>From: Yasuo Ohgaki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>Sent: Monday, February 11, 2002 8:21 PM
>>To: Chris Newbill
>>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] FWD: possible bug in date() function
>>
>>
>>Chris
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, February 11, 2002 8:21 PM
> To: Chris Newbill
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] FWD: possible bug in date() function
>
>
> Chris Newbill wrote:
> > Ehh...from manual
> >
> > n - month without leading zeros; i
Yasuo Ohgaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Chris Newbill wrote:
>> Ehh...from manual
>>
>> n - month without leading zeros; i.e. "1" to "12"
>>
>> So yeah it would print 2th. Cause today is the 10"th".
>
> The format does not make sense much, though.
sure it does. the 'bug' reporter had a bogu
Chris Newbill wrote:
> Ehh...from manual
>
> n - month without leading zeros; i.e. "1" to "12"
>
> So yeah it would print 2th. Cause today is the 10"th".
The format does not make sense much, though.
I guess 1th, 2th are correct English now, instead of
1st, 2nd. ;)
--
Yasuo Ohgaki
>
> -Chr
Ehh...from manual
n - month without leading zeros; i.e. "1" to "12"
So yeah it would print 2th. Cause today is the 10"th".
-Chris
-Original Message-
From: Yasuo Ohgaki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2002 12:47 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PHP-DEV] FWD: po
