Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: is_*

2002-11-19 Thread Derick Rethans
On Thu, 14 Nov 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > What about making FALIASES so it can be found in is_*? Really easier for > newbies. We generally don't want to clutter our function namespaces with aliases UNLESS there is a very good reason for. Derick -- --

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: is_*

2002-11-19 Thread nicos
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 10:21 AM Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: is_* > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Okay, some of them are in ctype. But it should be easier to have them in > > standard so basic user should use them. > > ctype is enabled by defa

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: is_*

2002-11-14 Thread Hartmut Holzgraefe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What about making FALIASES so it can be found in is_*? Really easier for newbies. We want to get rid of function aliases whereever possible, not generate new ones. We talked about the naming for the ctype functions back then when i wrote them and decided not to use is_*

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: is_*

2002-11-14 Thread Maxim Maletsky
I was refering about ctype lib :) -- Maxim Maletsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maxim Maletsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote... : > even earlier, I though... > > What really needs to be done is to document them better under ereg* and > preg* and, maybe even, strings sections of documentation. This, I thin

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: is_*

2002-11-14 Thread Maxim Maletsky
even earlier, I though... What really needs to be done is to document them better under ereg* and preg* and, maybe even, strings sections of documentation. This, I think, would give them the required famousity. -- Maxim Maletsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hartmut Holzgraefe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote..

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: is_*

2002-11-14 Thread Hartmut Holzgraefe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Okay, some of them are in ctype. But it should be easier to have them in standard so basic user should use them. ctype is enabled by default in 4.3 ... -- Six Offene Systeme GmbH http://www.six.de/ i.A. Hartmut Holzgraefe Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel.: +49-711-990