Re: AW: [PHP-DEV] arrays

2001-05-14 Thread Andrei Zmievski
At 06:49 PM 5/14/01 -0400, Stig Sæther Bakken wrote: >Any XML-RPC implementation would benefit from seeing easily whether a >value is a continous pure numeric array, associative array or a mix. >It should be a trivial fix, and the performance difference is >negligible. WDDX would benefit from it

Re: AW: [PHP-DEV] arrays

2001-05-14 Thread Stig Sæther Bakken
Any XML-RPC implementation would benefit from seeing easily whether a value is a continous pure numeric array, associative array or a mix. It should be a trivial fix, and the performance difference is negligible. - Stig [Zeev Suraski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] > Why do you need it? Nobody ever neede

Re: AW: [PHP-DEV] arrays

2001-05-13 Thread derick
On Sun, 13 May 2001, Zeev Suraski wrote: > Why do you need it? Nobody ever needed it until now. It'll slightly slow > down each and every hash update all over PHP, so unless it's really > necessary, we should do without it... The SRM extension would benefit from it too, we now need to loop trh

Re: AW: [PHP-DEV] arrays

2001-05-13 Thread Sascha Schumann
On Sun, 13 May 2001, Zeev Suraski wrote: > Why do you need it? Nobody ever needed it until now. It'll slightly slow > down each and every hash update all over PHP, so unless it's really > necessary, we should do without it... The serializer in the session module would benefit from it as

Re: AW: [PHP-DEV] arrays

2001-05-13 Thread Zeev Suraski
Why do you need it? Nobody ever needed it until now. It'll slightly slow down each and every hash update all over PHP, so unless it's really necessary, we should do without it... Zeev At 19:40 13/5/2001, Harald Radi wrote: >thanks, but wouldn't it desireable to have such a flag ? it wouldn't