On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 10:26:46AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Oh, and just to be clear about it: I am absolutely positive on
> a completely new (perhaps unified) extension for PHP 5, and
> would gladly participate.
hmm, sure - why not. we could start to brainstoorm about that
and d
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 10:22:04AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm sure glad this in the headlines again ;-)
>
> As Thies knows, I already proposed another important change,
> which is supporting multiple character sets. This is very
> important on shared web platforms, and I have experienc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 16.10.02 14:27:35:
>
> I think, at this point, it is up to Thies to review the patch.
>
I hope he's not too harsh on it ;-), since this code is certainly *not* ready for
merging into the cvs tree. Meaning: it merges perfectly, but doesn't compile correctly
on Orac
> -Message d'origine-
> De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Envoyé : mercredi 16 octobre 2002 10:22
> À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Objet : Re: Re: [PHP-DEV] OCI extension help offer
>
>
> I'm sure glad this in the headlines again ;-)
+1
&g
Oh, and just to be clear about it: I am absolutely positive on a completely new
(perhaps unified) extension for PHP 5, and would gladly participate. I Just don't
think that changing anything in the current situation would be useful.
Abdul
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 16.10.02 10:22:18:
> I'm
I'm sure glad this in the headlines again ;-)
As Thies knows, I already proposed another important change, which is supporting
multiple character sets. This is very important on shared web platforms, and I have
experienced the trouble that arises from the way the oci ext treats the session
env
