Hello Vincent,
Am 03.08.2022 um 13:56 schrieb Vincent de Lau:
The bylaws are not very clear on this, but I would think an Implicit
Approval would be sufficient here. My interpretation would be that a
1.0.0 release would require an Approval Vote, so there is enough room
to intervene before publ
On Wed, Aug 3, 2022, 10:12 Ralf Lang wrote:
>
> Am 03.08.2022 um 16:55 schrieb Larry Garfield:
> > On Wed, Aug 3, 2022, at 6:56 AM, Vincent de Lau wrote:
> >> The bylaws are not very clear on this, but I would think an Implicit
> >> Approval would be sufficient here. My interpretation would be th
Am 03.08.2022 um 16:55 schrieb Larry Garfield:
On Wed, Aug 3, 2022, at 6:56 AM, Vincent de Lau wrote:
The bylaws are not very clear on this, but I would think an Implicit
Approval would be sufficient here. My interpretation would be that a
1.0.0 release would require an Approval Vote, so there
On Wed, Aug 3, 2022, at 6:56 AM, Vincent de Lau wrote:
> The bylaws are not very clear on this, but I would think an Implicit
> Approval would be sufficient here. My interpretation would be that a
> 1.0.0 release would require an Approval Vote, so there is enough room
> to intervene before publi
The bylaws are not very clear on this, but I would think an Implicit
Approval would be sufficient here. My interpretation would be that a 1.0.0
release would require an Approval Vote, so there is enough room to
intervene before publishing a 1.0.0 release.
While on the subject of renaming, it se
