On Mar 15, 2012, at 11:52 AM, Stuart Dallas wrote:
> Change your php.ini settings to log to a file and set display_errors to off.
Sometimes when you ask a stupid question you end up getting a brilliant
answer. I had no idea about any of this until I received your response, which
got me
On 3/17/2012 12:52 PM, Al wrote:
On 3/15/2012 11:04 AM, Tedd Sperling wrote:
$first_name = $_SESSION['first_name'] ? $_SESSION['first_name'] : null;
$first_name = isset($_POST['first_name']) ? $_POST['first_name'] : $first_name;
$_SESSION['first_name'] = $first_name;
$_SESSION['first_name
On Sat, 2012-03-17 at 12:52 -0400, Al wrote:
>
> On 3/15/2012 11:04 AM, Tedd Sperling wrote:
> > $first_name = $_SESSION['first_name'] ? $_SESSION['first_name'] : null;
> > $first_name = isset($_POST['first_name']) ? $_POST['first_name'] :
> > $first_name;
> > $_SESSION['first_name'] = $first_na
On 3/15/2012 11:04 AM, Tedd Sperling wrote:
$first_name = $_SESSION['first_name'] ? $_SESSION['first_name'] : null;
$first_name = isset($_POST['first_name']) ? $_POST['first_name'] : $first_name;
$_SESSION['first_name'] = $first_name;
$_SESSION['first_name'] = (isset($_POST['first_name']))?
On 17 Mar 2012, at 15:02, rene7705 wrote:
> The relatively crappy code in /code/sitewide_rv/lib_fileSystem.php is
> certainly not indicative of the quality of the rest of the library, I'll
> guarantee you. Just take a look at the output of
> get_animatedJavascriptWidgets_javascript.php in the so
[snip]
> As for minifying the javascripts, it would take me another day, maybe 2, to
> build a script for that.
> And I don't think it would matter much, all the animatedJavascriptWidgets
> JS is gzipped 25kb and if I shave 5kb off that (upper estimate) then I
> don't consider that worth the effort
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 2:07 PM, Stuart Dallas wrote:
> On 17 Mar 2012, at 10:54, rene7705 wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 11:13 PM, Stuart Dallas wrote:
>
>> Why do you think other libraries such as jquery recommend minifying their
>> code before deployment, and then serving it via gzip? Eve
On 17 Mar 2012, at 10:54, rene7705 wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 11:13 PM, Stuart Dallas wrote:
> Why do you think other libraries such as jquery recommend minifying their
> code before deployment, and then serving it via gzip? Every bit and byte
> counts, especially as you scale up.
>
> The
In response to critiques about my download size, I've removed scenejs and
the artwork for my own site-logos from the zip. The size is now 38mb, down
from 54mb.
I'm also using 7-zip now, I hope it opens better on non-windows OSes.
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Ashley Sheridan
wrote:
> **
> On Fri, 2012-03-16 at 22:11 +0100, rene7705 wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 10:08 PM, Tommy Pham wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 1:45 PM, Stuart Dallas wrote:
> > >
> > >> As for my files and homepage being Huge, yep, it's m
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 11:13 PM, Stuart Dallas wrote:
> On 16 Mar 2012, at 20:53, rene7705 wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 9:45 PM, Stuart Dallas wrote:
> >> On 16 Mar 2012, at 20:36, rene7705 wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 9:29 PM, Stuart Dallas
> wrote:
> >> >> On 16 Mar 2012,
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 10:17 PM, Govinda wrote:
> Everyone makes valid points.. and depending on ones perspective, certain
> of those points are more important than others... but, because of my nature
> anyway, I want to just say thanks to rene7705 for bothering. He is not
> trying to take anyt
On Fri, 2012-03-16 at 22:11 +0100, rene7705 wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 10:08 PM, Tommy Pham wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 1:45 PM, Stuart Dallas wrote:
> > >
> > >> As for my files and homepage being Huge, yep, it's made for the future
> > or current fast internet connections.
> >
13 matches
Mail list logo
