I am partial to the filesystem but I can see scenarios where the db
approach might be useful (single point of control) with good caching
strategy using apc or other mechanisms.
One approach I have followed is that if the config. field and values
are simple key-value pairs, you could store them in
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 11:39 AM, J Ravi Menon jravime...@gmail.com wrote:
I am partial to the filesystem but I can see scenarios where the db
approach might be useful (single point of control) with good caching
strategy using apc or other mechanisms.
One approach I have followed
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 1:37 PM, Joe Jackson priory...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi
I am trying the following snippet as Bostjan suggested, and an email is
getting sent when I submit the form however in the body of the email I am
getting none of the form data in the body of the email. All I am
Just on this topic, I found swiftmailer library to be really useful
esp. in dealing with 'template' emails with custom variables per
recipient:
http://swiftmailer.org/
The e.g. on email template processing:
http://swiftmailer.org/docs/decorator-plugin-howto
There are batchSend()
Menon jravime...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Per Jessen p...@computer.org wrote:
J Ravi Menon wrote:
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 12:43 AM, Per Jessen p...@computer.org wrote:
J Ravi Menon wrote:
Few questions:
1) Does opcode cache really matter in such cli-based
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 12:43 AM, Per Jessen p...@computer.org wrote:
J Ravi Menon wrote:
Few questions:
1) Does opcode cache really matter in such cli-based daemons? As
'SomeClass' is instantiated at every loop, I am assuming it is only
compiled once as it has already been 'seen'.
Yup
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Per Jessen p...@computer.org wrote:
J Ravi Menon wrote:
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 12:43 AM, Per Jessen p...@computer.org wrote:
J Ravi Menon wrote:
Few questions:
1) Does opcode cache really matter in such cli-based daemons? As
'SomeClass' is instantiated
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 8:50 PM, Shawn McKenzie nos...@mckenzies.net wrote:
On 09/10/2010 11:13 AM, J Ravi Menon wrote:
Hi,
I have some basic questions on running php (5.2.x series on Linux
2.6) as a standalone daemon using posix methods (fork() etc..):
#!/usr/bin/php
?php
require_once
Other than coding standards, the other good read is:
(it seems to cover most topics I have ran into while maintaining a
high traffic site implemented in php 5):
http://phplens.com/lens/php-book/optimizing-debugging-php.php
It is 'best practices' from another angle - use of opcode cache (apc
PHP does expose sys V shared-memory apis (shm_* functions):
http://us2.php.net/manual/en/book.sem.php
If you already have apc installed, you could also try:
http://us2.php.net/manual/en/book.apc.php
APC also allows you to store user specific data too (it will be in a
shared memory).
Haven't
versions.
Ravi
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 3:49 PM, D. Dante Lorenso da...@lorenso.com wrote:
J Ravi Menon wrote:
PHP does expose sys V shared-memory apis (shm_* functions):
http://us2.php.net/manual/en/book.sem.php
I will look into this. I really need a key/value map, though and would
rather
Hi Bob,
[Couldn't resist jumping into this topic :)]
Even if you look at traditional unix (or similar) kernel internals,
although they tend to use functional paradigms, they do have a
OOP-like flavor. Example:
Everything in a unix system is a 'file' (well not really with
networking logic, but
Hi,
A note on bytecode caching and include/include_once performance. A
while ago when we were profiling our code, we did notice that file
includes do take a noticeable percentage of overall overhead (enough
for us to look into it more deep). We are using apc cache on a
standard LAMP platform
Sorry forgot to mention that we used APC with apc.stat turned off
which will give a little bit more performance gain, but it does mean
flushing the cache on every code push (which is trivial).
Ravi
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 11:30 AM, J Ravi Menon jravime...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
A note
14 matches
Mail list logo
