In my experience with the other frameworks (primarily Wasp, CakePHP,
Symfony, eZ Components, and Zend Framework), I've found that I was not
satisfied with the quantity of low-quality code they advocate. I have
a high standard for code quality, readability, maintainability, and
(more generally)
You guys make me laugh... :)
(And I really actually mean that in a nice way... that last bit was
quite funny. And yes, size does matter... some don't like it _too_
big.)
But, I digress.
I'm OK with taking this off-list... though I'd rather publicly reply.
Yeah, I meant procedural, not
Yes, I absolutely agree that Rasmus is awesome and his accomplishments
are far and beyond amazing, but I'm saying that I think that Rasmus is
motivated to stay true to PHP's philosophies and not be willing to
rethink them: that is what I meant by that.
In no way am I saying that Rasmus doesn't
There's nothing wrong with staying true to the philosophy at all, I
just think that it may well be detrimental in the end. And that is
what I said in the (toilet)paper, that there will be (emphasis on the
eventuality, not on the present actuality) a time that PHP will become
the old stuff because
4 matches
Mail list logo
