How about
$foo = str_replace(' ','',$foo);
?
Or could there be an ' ' in a context where it shouldn't be replaced?
Thomas
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
> they have a word very suitable to this situation in dutch 'mierenneuken',
> personally I'd stick with pretty girls.
OT: Couldn't translate that in german, the nearest approach seems to be
"Haarspalterei" but unfortunately for me this seems not to match the
situation. And it doesn't meet pretty
From: "Zoltán Németh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> function example($elem='') {
>> static $store = array();
>
> AFAIK the above line should cause an error on the second run of the
> function, as you declare the same static variable for the second time.
>
> or am I wrong?
I think so - otherwise sta
The manual says:
In order to use variable variables with arrays, you have to resolve an
ambiguity problem. That is, if you write $$a[1] then the parser needs to
know if you meant to use $a[1] as a variable, or if you wanted $$a as the
variable and then the [1] index from that variable. The synt
Just to be curious:
when something like
if (defined('FOO') && FOO) {
class foo{};
function foo(){};
}
is parsed and FOO is not defined, will the code inside be parsed
nevertheless? Or is anything inside skipped, leading to a (fragments of
microseconds) faster handling of the code? Thus to
For some simple applications I use a function to collect values in a static
variable and to return them when called in a special way, just like this
(fairly senseless) example:
function example($elem='') {
static $store = array();
if (!func_num_args()) return($store);
... do something
Thank you for the answers.
My abstract:
Use separate files for separate code. Easy to maintain, no real loss in
performance. That's fine, as I'm just doing so (like if I need a database
abstraction, I include dbas.php and if dbas.php needs some miscellaneous
functionality, it includes misc.php
I got different portions of code only used for certain purposes (who don't
;-)?). But what, in your opinion (better: in your experience) would be the
best regarding script-performance: Putting each code-portion in a separate
file and include it if required, putting it in a constant-dependent
if
Wouldn't this be solved if the email is simply an answer to the thread
instead of a new, separate email? Within the thread about nested files
(http://www.nabble.com/Nested-include-require-not-working-in-5.2-tf4882937.html)
there was also an email with a changed subject ("(SOLVED)" was added), bu
Did you look for files named config.php? I would try to find out which file
is loaded instead of the wanted one. Maybe you could use
fopen('config.php','r',TRUE); and check the contents of that file to get an
idea where it comes from? If it happens only with a file of this name, I
would assume
So long, I solved it by myself. As I'm only using dgettext() and the domain
always is represented by a constant, I simply collect all php-files, then
preg_match_all() occurences of dgettext() (with domain in mind), put the
texts in the different corresponding files and, as I'm on the way, conver
No ideas? Am I the only one using different domains with dgettext? What's
the sense of it if you can't get the translations apart?
Any hint is welcome ...
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Hi!
>
> I'm using dgettext() with different domains in one set of script
Hi!
I'm using dgettext() with different domains in one set of scripts (or even
in one script). When extracting the messages with xgettext I would like to
specify an option to get only messages for one domain, like getting all
messages from calls to dgettext('foobar',...) and ignore all others.
13 matches
Mail list logo
