Quoting Richard Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Gerben wrote:
> > I'm wondering if there is any DBMS, like MySQL, which is (fully)
> > implemented
> > in php. This so you don't have to buy a MySQL database.
>
> MySQL is free...
MySQL is free for use with applications that are themselves open source.
Quoting Donald Tyler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I did RTFM. The exact page you linked to in fact:
>
> QUOTE:
>
>
> Requirements
>
> In order to have these functions available, you must compile PHP with
> support for the mysqli extension.
>
>
> END QUOTE
>
> That is the whole point of my request. I n
Quoting Richard Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Actually, internally, it *is* a file, or part of a file, depending on the
> database implementation details. (*)
Part of a file? Usually. A file? Rarely.
And as part of a file, it is likely to be accessed using a more poorly chosen
I/O model than if
Quoting I l <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> So, you would prefer storing the uploaded file in your directory than a
> database? Have you tried either method?
And, by the way, once you upload it into a database, it's not a file. It's just
a data field.
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To
Quoting I l <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I never said that this method wouldn't cause you overhead. With all respect,
> I am simply stating that this method is much simpler. Sometimes you must
> choose simplicity over processing costs. What if there was another
> programmer editing your code? Or, you ca
Quoting I l <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Lets say you want to store someones picture.
>
> In the database, you would insert the picture, who owns that picture, maybe
> the ip address and request headers of where that picture came from, the
> category, sub-category, sub-sub-category in which the picture
Quoting I l <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> And finally, file management is much much easier when you store the files in
> a database.
There is a kind of database that is perfectly designed and equipped to store
files, and their very specific metadata properties, optimized for the correct
sort of access.
Quoting John Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > Why not simply 'Read The Fine Manual', or 'Read The Fantastic
> > > Manual'? Why does it have to contain profanity?
> >
> > For all practical purposes:
> >
> > RTFM == "read the manual"
> >
> > If someone finds it offensive then they're either de
Quoting "Ashley M. Kirchner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, 29 Jul 2004, John Nichel wrote:
>
> > Harlequin wrote:
> > > RTFM...?
> >
> > AKA : Read The F**king Manual
>
> Why not simply 'Read The Fine Manual', or 'Read The Fantastic
> Manual'? Why does it have to contain profanity?
Becaus
Quoting Jason Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Most people who use the term RTFM do not attach any hostile intentions with
> it. If you're going to start getting all emotional about being told to RTFM
> then you should stay away frm mailing lists, the internet, and computers in
> general.
Well there *a
Quoting Matthew Sims <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> PHP5 released today! (for those that don't know yet) ;)
Jeez, now my users will be demanding we run a .0.0 release of a language that's
incompatible with what they were running yesterday... :)
Seriously, congrats.
--
PHP General Mailing List (http:
11 matches
Mail list logo
