Re: [PHP] General question: packaging in PHP

2005-02-03 Thread Terje Sletteb
From: Vivian Steller [EMAIL PROTECTED] Are there any thoughts about that in future releases? What do other developers think about this issue? How do organize multiple used classnames? The common answer is: Use a prefix... but i really dislike using cryptic and long prefixes to ensure

Re: [PHP] General question: packaging in PHP

2005-01-31 Thread Jason Barnett
Vivian Steller wrote: ... Thanks for metioning this issue! This is another point where I think OO is done the half way in PHP: Why do we need some implicit type check, like public method(Type $type) if we then loose the optional parameter advantage? I don't know *the* answer. So far as I

[PHP] General question: packaging in PHP

2005-01-30 Thread Vivian Steller
Hello, i've a general question concerning PHP's architecture. Why isn't there a native packaging concept in PHP? I think php became much more powerfull with the extended OOP features introduced in PHP5 - without a packaging concept you couldn't use these features in big business (in terms of

Re: [PHP] General question: packaging in PHP

2005-01-30 Thread Terje Slettebø
From: Vivian Steller [EMAIL PROTECTED] i've a general question concerning PHP's architecture. Why isn't there a native packaging concept in PHP? This was also suggested on comp.lang.php, recently (the nested class thread), called namespaces, but there wasn't a lot of enthusiasm for it.

Re: [PHP] General question: packaging in PHP

2005-01-30 Thread Vivian Steller
verffentlicht per Mail versendet Thanks for your answer! Terje Sletteb wrote: From: Vivian Steller [EMAIL PROTECTED] i've a general question concerning PHP's architecture. Why isn't there a native packaging concept in PHP? This was also suggested on comp.lang.php, recently (the nested