Oliver Grätz wrote:
All attempts at shutting of access to the code is bound to fail. PHP is
an interpreted anguage. If the script on the other server can read your
code then the programmer of that script can also read your sourcecode.
So, what to do?
You could use some of the encoders. Using the
All attempts at shutting of access to the code is bound to fail. PHP is
an interpreted anguage. If the script on the other server can read your
code then the programmer of that script can also read your sourcecode.
So, what to do?
You could use some of the encoders. Using these tools the other peo
I am new to this list so forgive me if this has already been
addressed. What I would like to do is keep a library of php scripts
on my site. I would like customer sites to call the functions in my
library, but have their server do the work. I would like to keep
the proprietary code off of the
At 08:34 AM 2/6/2006, Christopher Taylor wrote:
I only changed the file extension as an experiment. I understand
that the changing of the file extension does nothing for security,
but it does allow the functions residing on my site to be read and
executed on the client's server.
Chris,
PHP
Jochem Maas wrote:
search for 'php encoder' and use one (some cost money).
I believe that the php encoder keeps the syntax but changes the variable
names to make it less readable. I am not sure if this is enough.
changing an file extension from 'php' to 'inc' does nothing to protect your
code
Christopher Taylor wrote:
I am new to this list so forgive me if this has already been addressed.
What I would like to do is keep a library of php scripts on my site. I
would like customer sites to call the functions in my library, but have
their server do the work. I would like to keep the p
I am new to this list so forgive me if this has already been addressed.
What I would like to do is keep a library of php scripts on my site. I
would like customer sites to call the functions in my library, but have
their server do the work. I would like to keep the proprietary code off
of the
On Monday 19 February 2001 22:42, Kath wrote:
> > Why do a lot of people use libraries like PHPLib?
>
> I find it a lot better to write my own basic functions.
>
> Is it just the attitude "Someone else coded it already, why should I?"
Well, if you take a library you can be pretty sure that someo
> -Original Message-
> From: Kath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 19 February 2001 22:40
> To: Martin A. Marques
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [PHP] Libraries
>
>
> I don't exactly try to reinvent a new and better wheel... I
> just find th
ngs
that they'd know about if they had rolled their own modules once
in a while. personally, i feel that it's problematic when a person uses
another person's libraries/modules/code without really understanding
what the code does...
> -Original Message-
> From: Kath [mail
TED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2001 4:59 PM
Subject: Re: [PHP] Libraries
> Mensaje citado por: Kath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Why do a lot of people use libraries like PHPLib?
> >
> > I find it a lot better to write my own basic funct
Mensaje citado por: Kath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Why do a lot of people use libraries like PHPLib?
>
> I find it a lot better to write my own basic functions.
>
> Is it just the attitude "Someone else coded it already, why should I?"
Like some said to me "Don't re-invent the wheel"
Saludos...
Why do a lot of people use libraries like PHPLib?
I find it a lot better to write my own basic functions.
Is it just the attitude "Someone else coded it already, why should I?"
- Kath
13 matches
Mail list logo
