> Norah Jones hat am 26. April 2013 um 05:56 geschrieben:
> Hi,
>
> I have downloaded HipHop for my website, I am going through various web links
> which are suggesting that performance will improve 3-6 times. However I don't
> know the Stability of the HipHop.
>
> Please provide your inputs so th
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 1:56 PM, Norah Jones wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have downloaded HipHop for my website, I am going through various web
> links which are suggesting that performance will improve 3-6 times. However
> I don't know the Stability of the HipHop.
>
> Please provide your inputs so that I
Hey folks.
Has anybody played with this the PHP compiler for .NET, Phalanger?
http://www.php-compiler.net/
I'd be interested to hear of any experiences people have had using this.
Cheers,
Pablo
--
Pablo Gosse
Webmaster, University of Northern Br
Hello,
on 03/15/2005 03:05 AM Warren Vail said the following:
I could be wrong, but I believe that all the Java apps out there are not
native binary machine code either? unless you count the JRE (Java Runtime
Environment). Seems to me that is the way things are today, with JRE's all
having "run t
Jason Barnett wrote:
Jay Blanchard wrote:
[snip]
Sooo.. I'm assuming there's no stable project for compiling php code to
native binary machine code huh? (I've done some searching) Even
anything commercial? (I didn't care for Zend's optimizer so much.. still
has *RUN*time configuration)
[/snip]
ht
Jay Blanchard wrote:
> [snip]
> Sooo.. I'm assuming there's no stable project for compiling php code to
> native binary machine code huh? (I've done some searching) Even
> anything commercial? (I didn't care for Zend's optimizer so much.. still
>
> has *RUN*time configuration)
> [/snip]
>
> http:
You could try this Jay (I havent used it before, has anybody?)
http://www.roadsend.com/home/index.php?SMC=1
Zac
-Original Message-
From: Jay Blanchard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 15 March 2005 11:21
To: Davy Durham; php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: RE: [PHP] php compiler
[snip
[snip]
Sooo.. I'm assuming there's no stable project for compiling php code to
native binary machine code huh? (I've done some searching) Even
anything commercial? (I didn't care for Zend's optimizer so much.. still
has *RUN*time configuration)
[/snip]
http://www.priadoblender.com ?
--
PHP G
: Monday, March 14, 2005 9:22 PM
> To: php-general@lists.php.net
> Subject: [PHP] php compiler
>
>
> Sooo.. I'm assuming there's no stable project for compiling php code to
> native binary machine code huh? (I've done some searching) Even
> anything commercial? (I
Sooo.. I'm assuming there's no stable project for compiling php code to
native binary machine code huh? (I've done some searching) Even
anything commercial? (I didn't care for Zend's optimizer so much.. still
has *RUN*time configuration)
Thanks,
Davy
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.p
> I kind of hinted in my earlier what is going on but:
> $a = 1 && $b = 0;
> Is first silently evaluated as:
> $a = (1 && $b = 0);
thx your answer, just one more little thing...
> So the right expression is tested which happens to be ($b = 0).
...why ($b = 0) is on the right side, not only $b.
* Thus wrote Hodicska Gergely:
> Hi!
>
> > I think the precedence of left and right associative operands can't
> be > compared. The switch between associativities already separates the
> > expression (if it could be explained this way).
>
> Yes, this behaviour confused me. This is not common in o
Hi!
> I think the precedence of left and right associative operands can't
be > compared. The switch between associativities already separates the
> expression (if it could be explained this way).
Yes, this behaviour confused me. This is not common in other programming
languages:
o C : inva
* Thus wrote Hodicska Gergely:
> If you see the output, it seems, that PHP evaluate first $b = 0, and
> this is the problem.
>
> > $a = 1 && $b = 0
> > PHP sees two expressions here:
>
> After the precedence table the first thing should be evaluating 1 && $b,
> so we get:
> $a = false = 0
> Whi
Hodicska Gergely wrote:
Oke, but && has a higher precedence. The "right " associativity has
sense when all the operand has the same precedence.
I think the precedence of left and right associative operands can't be
compared. The switch between associativities already separates the
expression (if
"=" has a "right " associativity. This is well explained on the page you
Oke, but && has a higher precedence. The "right " associativity has
sense when all the operand has the same precedence.
Felho
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub
If you see the output, it seems, that PHP evaluate first $b = 0, and
this is the problem.
> $a = 1 && $b = 0
> PHP sees two expressions here:
After the precedence table the first thing should be evaluating 1 && $b,
so we get:
$a = false = 0
Which is not meaningful thing, and maybe this cause tha
Hodicska Gergely wrote:
$a = 1 && $b = 0
PHP sees two expressions here:
After the precedence table the first thing should be evaluating 1 && $b,
so we get:
$a = false = 0
Which is not meaningful thing, and maybe this cause that the evaluating
of the statment is not in the right order.
"=" has a "
Hodicska Gergely wrote:
> It outputs this: false bool(false) int(0)
Yes, this the right output.
And this output is absolutely correct. Your condition gives new values
to $a and $b because you use "=" and not "==". So you do this:
Maybe you never read this:
http://hu2.php.net/manual/en/language.op
> It outputs this: false bool(false) int(0)
Yes, this the right output.
> And this output is absolutely correct. Your condition gives new values
> to $a and $b because you use "=" and not "==". So you do this:
Maybe you never read this:
http://hu2.php.net/manual/en/language.operators.php#language.o
> Use == instead of = in the if condition.
Thx, I know the difference. The exapmle use willfuly =.
Felho
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
t:
ok, precedence :)
false
1
0
He gets:
true
false
0
I get (php-5.0.2):
false
false
0
Or am I missing something?
=M
-Original Message-
From: Hodicska Gergely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:
Saturday, October 30, 2004 9:50 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PHP] php compiler
Hi!
$a = 0;
$b =
true
false
0
I get (php-5.0.2):
false
false
0
Or am I missing something?
=M
-Original Message-
From: Hodicska Gergely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 30, 2004 9:50 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PHP] php compiler
Hi!
$a = 0;
$b = 1;
if ($a = 1 && $b = 0) {
Hodicska Gergely wrote:
$a = 0;
$b = 1;
if ($a = 1 && $b = 0) {
echo 'true ';
var_dump($a);
var_dump($b);
} else {
echo 'false ';
var_dump($a);
var_dump($b);
}
Runing this we get: "true bool(false) int(0)"
Are you sure you posted the example correctly? It outputs this: false
You're assigning values in your test.
Use == instead of = in the if condition.
=M
-Original Message-
From: Hodicska Gergely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 30, 2004 9:50 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PHP] php compiler
Hi!
$a = 0;
$b = 1;
if ($a = 1 &
Hi!
$a = 0;
$b = 1;
if ($a = 1 && $b = 0) {
echo 'true ';
var_dump($a);
var_dump($b);
} else {
echo 'false ';
var_dump($a);
var_dump($b);
}
Runing this we get: "true bool(false) int(0)"
After the precedence table the first step could be evaluating the
Try;
http://www.zend.com
Warren Vail
-Original Message-
From: Bill McCuistion [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 5:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PHP] PHP Compiler?
Sorry if this is an old question:
Where can I find information on any plans to
On Wed, 2004-10-27 at 19:26 -0500, Bill McCuistion wrote:
> Sorry if this is an old question:
>
> Where can I find information on any plans to create a compiler for PHP,
> especially v5.x?
>
> Barring that, is there a PHP syntax checker that would enforce some of the
> types of things that a co
Sorry if this is an old question:
Where can I find information on any plans to create a compiler for PHP,
especially v5.x?
Barring that, is there a PHP syntax checker that would enforce some of the
types of things that a compiler would find?
I remember from back in my MS-DOS days the very go
Hi there silly question, I was wondering if there is such a php compiler
available like javac to compile php classes into bytecode so they are native
to the php module and dont need to be compiled, but without any extension
like turk to make it work ? Unfortunately I want this functionality so the
Are there any win32 / *nix PHP compilers out there to make a binary
executable. I remember one for win32 a while back but that's no longer
even a glimmer in somebody's eyes anymore. Anyone have any info on the
subject? (I'm not even looking for something GTK compliant... just
something that works)
Jim Jagielski wrote:
> At 9:10 AM -0600 2/16/01, dmalcolm wrote:
> >Is there such a thing as a PHP compiler? Linux based? Windoze based?
> >
> >Thanks in advance.
> >
>
> Depends on what you mean by a compiler. If you mean a "package"
> that turns your PHP script into a 100% stand-alone binary
Chris Lee wrote:
> Zend Technologies has an encoder, might be what your looking for, might not.
> why do you want to compile your code, you havent mentioned ?
>
> --
>
> Chris Lee
> Mediawaveonline.com
>
> em. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> ph. 250.377.1095
> ph. 250.376.2690
> fx. 250.554.1120
>
> "dmalc
At 9:10 AM -0600 2/16/01, dmalcolm wrote:
>Is there such a thing as a PHP compiler? Linux based? Windoze based?
>
>Thanks in advance.
>
Depends on what you mean by a compiler. If you mean a "package"
that turns your PHP script into a 100% stand-alone binary executable
then No, there isn't. If y
Zend Technologies has an encoder, might be what your looking for, might not.
why do you want to compile your code, you havent mentioned ?
--
Chris Lee
Mediawaveonline.com
em. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ph. 250.377.1095
ph. 250.376.2690
fx. 250.554.1120
"dmalcolm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in messag
Is there such a thing as a PHP compiler? Linux based? Windoze based?
Thanks in advance.
DM
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PRO
36 matches
Mail list logo