[PHP] Re: [PHP-DEV] maybe we could all?

On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 19:38, Nathan Rixham wrote: > Daniel Brown wrote: >> >>A good place to start is by showing how this would benefit from >> things like PEAR and PECL. > > care to contrib that info / thoughts dan? :-) good idea. No, I'm just typing and multitasking with too many thin

Re: [PHP] Re: [PHP-DEV] maybe we could all?

On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 4:38 PM, Nathan Rixham wrote: > Daniel Brown wrote: > >> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 19:28, Daniel Brown wrote: >> >>> Maybe you could call it PEAR. ;-P >>> >> >>(Sent too quickly. Meant to include this, too:) >> >>A good place to start is by showing how this woul

[PHP] Re: [PHP-DEV] maybe we could all?

Daniel Brown wrote: On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 19:28, Daniel Brown wrote: Maybe you could call it PEAR. ;-P (Sent too quickly. Meant to include this, too:) A good place to start is by showing how this would benefit from things like PEAR and PECL. care to contrib that info / thou

[PHP] Re: [PHP-DEV] maybe we could all?

On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 19:28, Daniel Brown wrote: > >Maybe you could call it PEAR. ;-P (Sent too quickly. Meant to include this, too:) A good place to start is by showing how this would benefit from things like PEAR and PECL. Also note that phpclasses.org isn't an official or end

Re: [PHP] Re: [PHP-DEV] maybe we could all?

On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Daniel Brown wrote: > On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 18:57, Nathan Rixham wrote: > [snip!] > > > > the idea wouldn't be a framework or another php classes, more of a repo > full > > of common classes to save us all some time > [snip!] > >Maybe you could call it

[PHP] Re: [PHP-DEV] maybe we could all?

On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 18:57, Nathan Rixham wrote: [snip!] > > the idea wouldn't be a framework or another php classes, more of a repo full > of common classes to save us all some time [snip!] Maybe you could call it PEAR. ;-P -- daniel.br...@parasane.net || danbr...@php.net http://w